Samsung 990 EVO 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Samsung 990 EVO 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Samsung
87 综合评分
vs
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate
91 综合评分

买家怎么说

Samsung 990 EVO 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

88 满分 100 置信度中 11 条评价

用户普遍对这款三星SSD非常满意,称赞其快速的读写速度、简单的安装以及适合预算配置的性价比。一些人指出,像990 EVO PLUS这样带DRAM的替代品价格相近,可能是更好的选择,还有少数人提到需要额外螺丝或固件更新等小麻烦。总体而言,它被视为游戏和存储扩展的可靠之选。

优点
  • 读写速度快
  • 安装简单
  • 性价比高
  • 三星品质可靠
  • 适合游戏存储
缺点
  • 无DRAM设计
  • 需要固件更新
  • 需要额外螺丝
  • 散热器安装棘手
👍 Performance 6
👍 Ease of installation 4
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Dram less design 2
👎 Firmware update 2
👍 Gaming use 2

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

85 满分 100 置信度低 5 条评价

这款SSD因其卓越的耐用性和高耐久性而备受赞誉,5年质保和救援服务让人安心。用户强调其超快的顺序读写速度,非常适合游戏和繁重工作负载。支持DirectStorage是现代游戏配置的一个加分项。然而,一些人指出并非所有电脑都能保证兼容,建议检查系统要求。

优点
  • 5年质保
  • 包含救援服务
  • 高耐久性(5,050TBW)
  • 快速顺序读写
  • 支持DirectStorage
缺点
  • 兼容性不保证
  • 可能不适合所有电脑
👍 Durability 1
👍 Warranty 1
👍 Performance 1
👎 Compatibility 1
👍 Directstorage support 1

评分

Budget
Samsung
100
Seagate
73
Laptop
Samsung
89
Seagate
91
Gaming
Samsung
81
Seagate
86
Console
Samsung
63
Seagate
84
Workstation
Samsung
77
Seagate
83
Portable
Samsung
22
Seagate
24

规格

Samsung 990 EVOSeagate FireCuda 530R
Drive
Capacity
2,000
4,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation44
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
5,000
7,400
Sequential Write (MB/s)
4,200
6,800
Random Read (IOPS)
700,000
1,300,000
Random Write (IOPS)
800,000
1,300,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✗
ControllerSamsung in-house ControllerE18
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
1,200
5,050
MTBF (hours)无数据
1,800,000
Warranty (years)55
Features
Heatsink✗✗
Hardware Encryption✓★—

优缺点

Samsung 990 EVO 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong random (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong endurance (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong feature (79th percentile)

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong endurance (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong speed (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average affordability (7th percentile)7th %ile

结论

★ 胜出: Seagate FireCuda 530R

Scores 91 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 18 specs.

Samsung 990 EVO 更擅长:

Budget

Seagate FireCuda 530R 更擅长:

GamingConsoleWorkstation