Timetec Premium 16GB DDR4-2400

Timetec Premium 16GB DDR4-2400

Timetec
46 综合评分
vs
Team Group Xtreem 32GB DDR5-7200

Team Group Xtreem 32GB DDR5-7200

Team Group
80 综合评分

买家怎么说

Timetec Premium 16GB DDR4-2400

暂无用户反馈

Team Group Xtreem 32GB DDR5-7200

72 满分 100 置信度高 50 条评价

TeamGroup 这款高频 DDR5 内存套件在性能和散热方面获得多数好评,许多用户能在高端主板上达到标称速度。然而,也有相当一部分用户报告了稳定性问题、到货即损以及某些主板的兼容性问题,导致整体评价褒贬不一,但总体偏正面。

优点
  • 高速下性能出色
  • 散热片冷却效果显著
  • 高品质海力士A-die颗粒
  • 在高端主板上运行良好
  • 外观设计美观
缺点
  • 标称速度下稳定性问题
  • 有到货即损的报告
  • 与某些主板存在兼容性问题
  • PMIC电压被锁定
  • 价格大幅上涨
🤔 Performance at rated speed 12
👎 Stability 5
👍 Cooling 4
👎 Compatibility 6
👍 Build quality 3
👎 Value for money 2

评分

Gaming
Timetec
39
Team Group
90
Budget
Timetec
65
Team Group
84
Workstation
Timetec
40
Team Group
83
Laptop
Timetec
57
Team Group
61
Server
Timetec
21
Team Group
36

规格

Timetec PremiumTeam Group Xtreem
Memory
TypeDDR4DDR5★
Form FactorSODIMMUDIMM
Total Capacity
16,384
32,768
Modules12★
Per Module
16,384
16,384
Pins260288
Rank1Rx8—
Performance
Speed
2,400
7,200
CAS Latency17★34
Timings—34-42-42-84
Voltage1.2000000476837158★1.399999976158142
Class
ECC✗✗
Registered✗✗
OC Profile—Intel XMP 3.0, AMD EXPO
Features
RGB✗✗
Heat Spreader✗✓★

优缺点

Timetec Premium 16GB DDR4-2400

  • Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average speed (29th percentile)

Team Group Xtreem 32GB DDR5-7200

  • Strong speed (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong latency (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong feature (73rd percentile)
  • Strong capacity (71st percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (21st percentile)

价格

Timetec Premium 16GB DDR4-2400 is MX$12,800 cheaper (7.8x less).

Timetec Premium 16GB DDR4-24000.024每美元得分
vs
Team Group Xtreem 32GB DDR5-72000.005每美元得分

Timetec Premium 16GB DDR4-2400 性价比高 4.8 倍

Timetec Premium 16GB DDR4-2400

Team Group Xtreem 32GB DDR5-7200

结论

★ 胜出: Team Group Xtreem

Scores 80 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 5 of 16 specs.

Team Group Xtreem 更擅长:

BudgetGamingLaptopServerWorkstation

也值得考虑