ViewSonic VP3256-4K 32" Black 2022

ViewSonic VP3256-4K 32" Black 2022

ViewSonic
84 综合评分
vs
LG UltraGear 27GX790B-B 27" Black 2026

LG UltraGear 27GX790B-B 27" Black 2026

LG
72 综合评分

评分

Office
ViewSonic
91
LG
79
Professional
ViewSonic
90
LG
78
Creative
ViewSonic
81
LG
77
Gaming
ViewSonic
59
LG
71
Entertainment
ViewSonic
66
LG
67
Portable
ViewSonic
15
LG
13

规格

ViewSonic VP3256-4K 32"LG UltraGear 27GX790B-B 27"
Display
Size32"27"
Resolution3840 x 21602560 x 1440
Panel TypeIPSOLED
Aspect Ratio16:916:9
Curved
Performance
Refresh Rate60 Hz540 Hz
Response Time5 ms
Adaptive SyncAdaptive-SyncFreeSync Premium Pro
Color & HDR
Brightness350 nits335 nits
Color Gamut95% DCI-P3, 95% sRGB, 128% sRGB99.5% DCI-P3
Color Depth10 bit (8 bit + A-FRC)10-bit
HDRHDR10DisplayHDR True Black 500
HDR SupportHDRHDR10
Connectivity
HDMI Ports12
DisplayPort11
USB-C11
ThunderboltNo
Speakers
Headphone Jack
Ergonomics
Height Adjustable
Tilt
Swivel
Pivot
VESA Mount100x100100x100
Features
Webcam
Touchscreen
PIP/PBP
Power46W
Weight10.89 kg6.80 kg

优缺点

ViewSonic VP3256-4K 32" Black 2022

  • Strong display (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong color (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile

LG UltraGear 27GX790B-B 27" Black 2026

  • Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong color (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong feature (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (4th percentile)4th %ile

价格

ViewSonic VP3256-4K 32" Black 2022 is MX$4,369 cheaper (1.3x less).

ViewSonic VP3256-4K 32" Black 20220.006每美元得分
vs
LG UltraGear 27GX790B-B 27" Black 20260.004每美元得分

ViewSonic VP3256-4K 32" Black 2022 性价比高 1.5 倍

ViewSonic VP3256-4K 32" Black 2022

LG UltraGear 27GX790B-B 27" Black 2026

结论

胜出: ViewSonic VP3256-4K 32"

Scores 84 overall, wins 4 of 6 usage categories and 4 of 29 specs.

ViewSonic VP3256-4K 32" 更擅长:

OfficeCreativePortableProfessional

LG UltraGear 27GX790B-B 27" 更擅长:

Gaming

也值得考虑