Laowa Argus 33mm f/0.95 CF APO 33mm
Laowa
40 综合评分
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Nikon
90 综合评分
评分
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Landscape
Professional
Video Cinema
Street
Portrait
Macro
规格
| Laowa Argus 33mm f/0.95 CF APO 33mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 33 mm | 24 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 33 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 14 | 19 |
| Groups | 9 | 15 |
| Aspherical Elements | 1 | 2★ |
| ED Elements | 1 | 1 |
| Coating | — | ARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/11 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/0.95 | 4-6.3 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | Nikon Z |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.59 kg | 0.57 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 62 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | stepping motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 350 mm★ | 500 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:2★ | 0.28x |
优缺点
Laowa Argus 33mm f/0.95 CF APO 33mm
- Strong optical (67th percentile)
- Strong macro (67th percentile)
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
- Below average social proof (34th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
价格
Laowa Argus 33mm f/0.95 CF APO 33mm0.004每美元得分
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR0.005每美元得分
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR 性价比高 1.3 倍
Laowa Argus 33mm f/0.95 CF APO 33mm
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
结论
胜出: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.
