Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic
86 综合评分
vs
Viltrox AF 33/1.4 Z 33mm

Viltrox AF 33/1.4 Z 33mm

Viltrox
62 综合评分

评分

Macro
Panasonic
98
Viltrox
61
Budget
Panasonic
91
Viltrox
62
Landscape
Panasonic
86
Viltrox
52
Travel
Panasonic
86
Viltrox
61
Video Cinema
Panasonic
86
Viltrox
52
Street
Panasonic
80
Viltrox
69
Professional
Panasonic
80
Viltrox
57
Portrait
Panasonic
77
Viltrox
55
Wildlife Sports
Panasonic
77
Viltrox
59

规格

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mmViltrox AF 33/1.4 Z 33mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min28 mm33 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm33 mm
Elements1710
Groups139
Aspherical Elements1★—
ED Elements4★1
CoatingFluorine coatingHD Nano Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/16
Min Aperture4-7.1f/1.4
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountL-MountCanon EF-M
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.41 kg0.27 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusSTM★
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops6.5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance140 mm★400 mm
Max Magnification0.5x1:10★

优缺点

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Viltrox AF 33/1.4 Z 33mm

  • Strong build (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

价格

Viltrox AF 33/1.4 Z 33mm is MX$18,599 cheaper (5.3x less).

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm0.004每美元得分
vs
Viltrox AF 33/1.4 Z 33mm0.014每美元得分

Viltrox AF 33/1.4 Z 33mm 性价比高 3.5 倍

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Viltrox AF 33/1.4 Z 33mm

结论

★ 胜出: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Scores 86 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm 更擅长:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

也值得考虑