Carl Zeiss 000000-2096-517

Carl Zeiss 000000-2096-517

Carl Zeiss
35 综合评分
vs
Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Tamron
93 综合评分

评分

Professional
Carl Zeiss
27
Tamron
89
Budget
Carl Zeiss
41
Tamron
88
Portrait
Carl Zeiss
51
Tamron
87
Video Cinema
Carl Zeiss
33
Tamron
86
Macro
Carl Zeiss
15
Tamron
84
Landscape
Carl Zeiss
16
Tamron
77
Street
Carl Zeiss
38
Tamron
76
Travel
Carl Zeiss
18
Tamron
72
Wildlife Sports
Carl Zeiss
27
Tamron
69

规格

Carl Zeiss 000000-2096-517Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min18 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max18 mm75 mm
Elements17
Groups15
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements2
CoatingFluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountSony E
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.72 kg0.54 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeVXD
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance180 mm
Max Magnification1:2.7

优缺点

Carl Zeiss 000000-2096-517

  • Strong aperture (67th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (66th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average build (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

  • Strong optical (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong macro (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile

价格

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 is MX$3,402 cheaper (1.2x less).

Carl Zeiss 000000-2096-5170.002每美元得分
vs
Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G20.006每美元得分

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 性价比高 3.0 倍

Carl Zeiss 000000-2096-517

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

结论

胜出: Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Scores 93 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 更擅长:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

也值得考虑