Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM
Canon
84 综合评分
vs
Brightin Star 35mm F1.7 35mm
Brightin Star
73 综合评分
买家怎么说
Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM
82 满分 100 置信度高 331 条评价
佳能 EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM 镜头因其出色的锐度、快速安静的自动对焦和轻巧的设计而广受赞誉，对于业余摄影师和野生动物爱好者来说，性价比极高。许多用户强调长焦端令人印象深刻的画质和有效的图像稳定功能，尽管有些人注意到超过 200mm 时画质变软，最大光圈下有明显暗角。少数评论者遇到了质量控制问题，如图像模糊或对焦环失灵，但压倒性的共识是，这款镜头在其价位上提供了卓越的性能。
优点
- 价格下出色的锐度
- 快速安静的STM自动对焦
- 轻巧紧凑的设计
- 有效的图像稳定
- 极佳的性价比
缺点
- 超过200mm画质变软
- 最大光圈下明显暗角
- 塑料制造工艺
- 电子手动对焦需要相机供电
- 最大光圈较慢（250mm 时为 f/5.6）
Image quality 45
Autofocus performance 30
Value for money 35
Build quality 20
Image stabilization 18
Sharpness at long end 25
Brightin Star 35mm F1.7 35mm
92 满分 100 置信度中 18 条评价
索尼 FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II 镜头因其出色的锐度、快速自动对焦和低光性能而获得压倒性的积极反馈。用户强调其适用于摄影和视频，许多人注意到与之前的镜头相比有显著升级。一些问答涉及镜头关闭时内部移动的担忧，这被确认为稳定器的正常行为。总体而言，这款镜头强烈推荐给追求顶级图像质量的专业人士。
优点
- 出色的锐度
- 快速灵敏的自动对焦
- 出色的低光性能
- 非常适合视频
- 内部变焦机制
缺点
- 关闭时内部移动（正常）
- 非齐焦
- 电子对焦系统
Image quality 6
Autofocus performance 4
Low light performance 2
Video suitability 2
Build quality 5
Internal movement concerns 4
评分
Budget
Travel
Portrait
Street
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Landscape
Professional
Macro
规格
| Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM | Brightin Star 35mm F1.7 35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | wide-angle |
| Focal Length Min | 55 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 250 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 15 | 6 |
| Groups | 12 | 4 |
| Aspherical Elements | 0★ | — |
| ED Elements | 1★ | — |
| Coating | Super Spectra coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | f/1.7 |
| Min Aperture | 4-5.6 | f/1.7 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 10★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF-S | Fujifilm X |
| Format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | — |
| Weight | 0.38 kg | 0.33 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 58 mm | 43 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM★ | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 850 mm | 35 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.29x★ | — |
优缺点
Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average macro (32nd percentile)
Brightin Star 35mm F1.7 35mm
- Strong macro (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong aperture (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average optical (1st percentile)1st %ile
- Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
价格
Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM0.011每美元得分
vs
Brightin Star 35mm F1.7 35mm0.056每美元得分
Brightin Star 35mm F1.7 35mm 性价比高 5.1 倍
结论
胜出: Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM
Scores 84 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.
