Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
90 综合评分
vs
Brightin Star 2518

Brightin Star 2518

Brightin Star
52 综合评分

评分

Travel
Sony
94
Brightin Star
35
Street
Sony
91
Brightin Star
56
Budget
Sony
91
Brightin Star
43
Wildlife Sports
Sony
89
Brightin Star
30
Video Cinema
Sony
85
Brightin Star
47
Landscape
Sony
83
Brightin Star
26
Portrait
Sony
81
Brightin Star
66
Professional
Sony
81
Brightin Star
46
Macro
Sony
66
Brightin Star
53

规格

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSBrightin Star 2518
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm25 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm25 mm
Elements9
Groups8
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements1
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/1.8
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/1.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades710
Build
MountSony EFujifilm X
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.11 kg0.19 kg
Filter Thread41 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusmanual focus only
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm200 mm
Max Magnification0.215x

优缺点

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Brightin Star 2518

  • Strong bokeh (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong aperture (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong macro (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (25th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

价格

Brightin Star 2518 is MX$1,831 cheaper (2.3x less).

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.028每美元得分
vs
Brightin Star 25180.036每美元得分

Brightin Star 2518 性价比高 1.3 倍

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Brightin Star 2518

结论

胜出: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 更擅长:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

也值得考虑