Meike MK-3518FFSTM-L 35mm

Meike MK-3518FFSTM-L 35mm

Meike
63 综合评分
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm

Tamron
97 综合评分

评分

Video Cinema
Meike
68
Tamron
98
Budget
Meike
63
Tamron
96
Macro
Meike
69
Tamron
95
Professional
Meike
60
Tamron
92
Travel
Meike
45
Tamron
87
Portrait
Meike
58
Tamron
85
Landscape
Meike
55
Tamron
84
Street
Meike
63
Tamron
79
Wildlife Sports
Meike
51
Tamron
75

规格

Meike MK-3518FFSTM-L 35mmTamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm70 mm
Elements1216
Groups1012
Aspherical Elements23★
ED Elements3★2
CoatingMultilayer CoatingsFluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.8f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.40 kg★0.54 kg
Filter Thread58 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★RXD
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance350 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification1:7.71:4.8

优缺点

Meike MK-3518FFSTM-L 35mm

  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong macro (67th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm

  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong versatility (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile

价格

Meike MK-3518FFSTM-L 35mm is MX$8,864 cheaper (2.5x less).

Meike MK-3518FFSTM-L 35mm0.011每美元得分
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm0.007每美元得分

Meike MK-3518FFSTM-L 35mm 性价比高 1.6 倍

Meike MK-3518FFSTM-L 35mm

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm

结论

★ 胜出: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm

Scores 97 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm 更擅长:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

也值得考虑