Technics EAH-A800
Technics
92 综合评分
vs
Skullcandy Icon ANC
Skullcandy
74 综合评分
买家怎么说
Technics EAH-A800
82 满分 100 置信度中 11 条评价
Technics EAH-A800 耳机因其卓越的音质而获得压倒性的积极反馈，许多用户将其与有线耳机相媲美，尤其是在使用 LDAC 编解码器时。评论者称赞其佩戴舒适、主动降噪效果出色，以及能够营造出具有清晰立体声分离度的沉浸式声场。然而，少数用户报告了耐用性问题，例如头梁材料在一个月内松动以及一年后出现故障组件，而其他用户则建议进行小幅改进，例如更大的耳罩和更多的均衡器频段。
优点
- 卓越的音质
- 有效的主动降噪
- 佩戴舒适
- 沉浸式声场和立体声分离
- 支持 LDAC 编解码器，实现高品质音频
缺点
- 头梁材料的耐用性问题
- 一年后出现故障组件
- 耳罩可以稍大一些
- 头梁在头皮上感觉有点硬
- 只有 5 个均衡器频段（希望更多）
Sound quality 7
Build quality 2
Comfort 3
Anc performance 2
Ldac codec 3
Eq customization 2
Skullcandy Icon ANC
82 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
Skullcandy Icon ANC 耳机因其长续航、舒适性和耐用性而备受赞誉。用户喜欢其轻巧的设计和清晰的声音，尽管有些人希望降噪和最大音量能更强。总体而言，它们提供了出色的性价比，尤其适合旅行和日常使用。
优点
- 长续航
- 长时间佩戴舒适
- 轻巧便携的设计
- 清晰的音质
- 耐用的构造
缺点
- 降噪效果有待提升
- 最大音量不够大
- 长时间佩戴耳垫可能引起不适
Battery life 6
Comfort 5
Sound quality 5
Noise cancellation 5
Build quality 4
Volume level 1
评分
Work
Gaming
Budget
Calls
Commute
Studio
Music
规格
| Technics EAH-A800 | Skullcandy Icon ANC | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.30 kg | 0.23 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | super-soft earpads | — |
| Headband | — | metal |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Drivers | 1 | 1 |
| Freq Min | 4 Hz★ | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 34 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 105 dB★ | 97.5 dB |
| Max SPL | — | 97.5 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | AAC, LDAC, SBC | Skullcandy Icon ANC Wireless On-Ear Bluetooth Headphones, Active Noise Cancelling, Up to 60 Hours Battery, Sweat Water Resistant, Foldable and Durable, Microphone for iPhone Android - True Black |
| Surround | Technics - Wireless Noise Cancelling Over-Ear Headphones with 2 Device Multipoint Connectivity - EAH-A800-S Silver | Technics - Wireless Noise Cancelling Over-Ear | Technics | Silver | Over Ear | Over | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | Dual Hybrid feedforward & feedback | adjustable |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | 1 m | — |
| Range | 10.100000381469727 m★ | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 50 hrs | 60 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | 3 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15 Minutes for 10 Hours | 10 Minutes for 4 Hours |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 8★ | 1 |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Boom Mic | ✗ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Siri, Alexa | voice assistant |
| Touch Controls | ✗ | ✗ |
| App | Technics Audio Connect | Mimi |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | — | IPX4 |
优缺点
Technics EAH-A800
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
Skullcandy Icon ANC
- Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong battery (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong anc (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong connectivity (88th percentile)88th %ile
价格
Technics EAH-A8000.008每美元得分
vs
Skullcandy Icon ANC0.034每美元得分
Skullcandy Icon ANC 性价比高 4.3 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-A800
Scores 92 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 8 of 41 specs.
