Technics EAH-A800
Technics
90 综合评分
vs
TOZO HT3
TOZO
86 综合评分
买家怎么说
Technics EAH-A800
82 满分 100 置信度中 11 条评价
Technics EAH-A800 耳机因其卓越的音质而获得压倒性的积极反馈，许多用户将其与有线耳机相媲美，尤其是在使用 LDAC 编解码器时。评论者称赞其佩戴舒适、主动降噪效果出色，以及能够营造出具有清晰立体声分离度的沉浸式声场。然而，少数用户报告了耐用性问题，例如头梁材料在一个月内松动以及一年后出现故障组件，而其他用户则建议进行小幅改进，例如更大的耳罩和更多的均衡器频段。
优点
- 卓越的音质
- 有效的主动降噪
- 佩戴舒适
- 沉浸式声场和立体声分离
- 支持 LDAC 编解码器，实现高品质音频
缺点
- 头梁材料的耐用性问题
- 一年后出现故障组件
- 耳罩可以稍大一些
- 头梁在头皮上感觉有点硬
- 只有 5 个均衡器频段（希望更多）
Sound quality 7
Build quality 2
Comfort 3
Anc performance 2
Ldac codec 3
Eq customization 2
TOZO HT3
92 满分 100 置信度中 21 条评价
根据19条评论，TOZO HT3耳机因其出色的音质、令人印象深刻的降噪功能以及非凡的性价比而获得压倒性的积极反馈。用户一致称赞其长续航电池、长时间佩戴的舒适性以及带有可自定义均衡器的实用配套应用程序。主要的批评点是次要的：有些人觉得塑料外壳有点廉价，降噪效果不错但并非市场上最好的，还有一位用户指出佩戴时可能会看起来有点笨重。
优点
- 非凡的性价比
- 出色的音质，人声清晰，低音有力
- 在这个价位上令人印象深刻的降噪效果
- 常规使用下续航数天的长电池寿命
- 长时间佩戴非常舒适
缺点
- 塑料外壳感觉有点廉价
- 降噪效果不错但并非市场最佳
- 按钮可以改进
- 佩戴时可能看起来有点笨重
- 说明书文字太小
Sound quality 18
Value for money 15
Noise cancellation 14
Battery life 10
Comfort 10
Build quality 6
评分
Work
Gaming
Budget
Calls
Commute
Studio
Music
规格
| Technics EAH-A800 | TOZO HT3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.30 kg | 0.25 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | super-soft earpads | Sponge |
| Headband | — | Silicone Protein Sponge |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Drivers | 1 | 2★ |
| Freq Min | 4 Hz★ | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 34 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 105 dB★ | 100 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | AAC, LDAC, SBC | TOZO HT3 Hybrid Noise Cancelling Headphones, 90H Playtime Wireless Over Ear Bluetooth Headset, Spatial Audio AI Chat with 5 Mics, Supports Dual Connection and USB-C Input, with 32 EQ Music Modes, Blue |
| Surround | Technics - Wireless Noise Cancelling Over-Ear Headphones with 2 Device Multipoint Connectivity - EAH-A800-S Silver | Technics - Wireless Noise Cancelling Over-Ear | Technics | Silver | Over Ear | Over | Spatial Audio |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | Dual Hybrid feedforward & feedback | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.2★ | 6.0 |
| Profiles | A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓★ | — |
| Cable Length | 1 m | — |
| Range | 10.100000381469727 m | 15 m★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 50 hrs | 90 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | 3 hrs | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | 15 Minutes for 10 Hours | 10 min for 9 hours playback |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 8★ | 4 |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Boom Mic | ✗ | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Siri, Alexa | Other |
| Touch Controls | ✗ | ✗ |
| App | Technics Audio Connect | TOZO App |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
| Water Resistance | — | IPX4 |
优缺点
Technics EAH-A800
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong sound (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
TOZO HT3
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong battery (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
价格
Technics EAH-A8000.008每美元得分
vs
TOZO HT30.143每美元得分
TOZO HT3 性价比高 17.9 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-A800
Scores 90 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 7 of 41 specs.
