Bose 880066-0100

Bose 880066-0100

Bose
57 综合评分
vs
Beyerdynamic 1001971

Beyerdynamic 1001971

Beyerdynamic
15 综合评分

评分

Budget
Bose
62
Beyerdynamic
21
Work
Bose
62
Beyerdynamic
8
Calls
Bose
58
Beyerdynamic
6
Gaming
Bose
58
Beyerdynamic
8
Commute
Bose
54
Beyerdynamic
9
Music
Bose
48
Beyerdynamic
13
Studio
Bose
31
Beyerdynamic
13

规格

Bose 880066-0100Beyerdynamic 1001971
Design
Form Factorover-earon-ear
Open/Closedclosed
Weight0.25 kg0.32 kg
Audio
CodecsAAC
Noise Control
ANC
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
ProfilesA2DP, AVRCP, HFP, HSP
Multipoint
Wired Connector3.5mm
Detachable Cable
Battery
Battery Life24 hrs
Charge Time4 hrs
Fast Charging10 min for 5 hours playback
ChargingUSB-C
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantSiri, Google Assistant
Touch Controls
AppBose Music

优缺点

Bose 880066-0100

  • Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong mic (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong anc (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average comfort (34th percentile)

Beyerdynamic 1001971

  • Below average comfort (11th percentile)11th %ile
  • Below average social proof (11th percentile)11th %ile
  • Below average mic (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average sound (24th percentile)

价格

Both products are similarly priced.

Bose 880066-01000.006每美元得分
vs
Beyerdynamic 10019710.002每美元得分

Bose 880066-0100 性价比高 3.0 倍

Bose 880066-0100

Beyerdynamic 1001971

结论

胜出: Bose 880066-0100

Scores 57 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 12 of 21 specs.

Bose 880066-0100 更擅长:

WorkCallsMusicBudgetGamingStudioCommute

也值得考虑