Riwbox AC2
Riwbox
50 综合评分
vs
JBL Tune 670NC
JBL
91 综合评分
买家怎么说
Riwbox AC2
72 满分 100 置信度中 12 条评价
Riwbox Hybrid Active Noise Cancelling 耳机在音质、舒适度和电池续航方面普遍获得好评，许多用户称赞其性价比。然而，相当数量的评论提到了电话后出现的高频反馈或尖叫声、连接问题以及糟糕的客户服务。虽然降噪和轻量化设计受到赞赏，但也有人指出了对耐用性的担忧以及通话时麦克风性能不稳定。
优点
- 出色的降噪效果
- 价格合理的良好音质
- 佩戴舒适
- 电池续航长
- 轻量化设计
缺点
- 通话后出现高频反馈/刺耳声
- 客户服务差
- 部分设备音质模糊
- 连接问题
- 麦克风不适合长时间通话
Noise cancellation 5
Sound quality 7
Battery life 4
Comfort 5
Build quality 2
Customer support 3
JBL Tune 670NC
87 满分 100 置信度中 16 条评价
大多数用户喜爱这款JBL耳机，称赞其出色的音质、有效的降噪、舒适的佩戴和长续航，许多人认为性价比很高。一位评论者报告了一个有缺陷的单元，一侧没有声音。简单的控制、可折叠的设计和应用程序连接也受到好评。总体情绪非常积极，但有一个小的质量控制问题。
优点
- 出色的音质
- 有效的降噪
- 长电池寿命
- 舒适的佩戴
- 很高的性价比
缺点
- 可能有缺陷的单元（一侧无声音）
- 问答区的问题没有答案
Sound quality 5
Noise cancellation 4
Battery life 3
Comfort 2
Value for money 3
Build quality 1
评分
Budget
Commute
Gaming
Work
Music
Studio
Calls
规格
| Riwbox AC2 | JBL Tune 670NC | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | on-ear |
| Open/Closed | — | closed |
| Foldable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.28 kg | 0.17 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | protein | soft ear cushions |
| Headband | — | padded headband |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 40 mm★ | 32 mm |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 20 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 98 dB★ |
| Max SPL | — | 95 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✗ |
| Codecs | Riwbox Hybrid Active Noise Cancelling Headphones, Wireless Over Ear Bluetooth Headset, 60H Playtime, High-Fidelity, Foldable, Comfort&Immersion for Work/Commuting (Blue) | SBC, AAC, LC3 |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | hybrid | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | A2DP 1.4, AVRCP, HFP 1.8 |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | — | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | — | ✓★ |
| Cable Length | — | 1.2192000150680542 m |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 60 hrs | 70 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 5min=3hrs |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Capacity | — | 690 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | — | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 1★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | voice assistant |
| Touch Controls | — | ✗ |
| App | — | JBL Headphones |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
优缺点
Riwbox AC2
- Strong battery (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong anc (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong comfort (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong social proof (69th percentile)
- Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
- Below average connectivity (33rd percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
JBL Tune 670NC
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong battery (94th percentile)94th %ile
价格
Riwbox AC20.077每美元得分
vs
JBL Tune 670NC0.092每美元得分
JBL Tune 670NC 性价比高 1.2 倍
结论
胜出: JBL Tune 670NC
Scores 91 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 39 specs.
