SonoFlow HQ51
1MORE
58 综合评分
vs
Technics EAH-A800
Technics
91 综合评分
买家怎么说
SonoFlow HQ51
85 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
1MORE SonoFlow Pro 耳机因其出色的性价比而广受赞誉，以实惠的价格提供了良好的降噪效果、令人满意的音质和令人印象深刻的电池续航。用户强调其舒适贴合和轻巧设计，尽管有人指出耳垫在长时间佩戴后可能会变得不舒适，按钮感觉有点廉价。总体而言，它们被认为是100美元以下的最佳选择，超越了该价位段的许多竞争对手。
优点
- 出色的性价比
- 有效的降噪效果
- 支持LDAC的良好音质
- 令人印象深刻的电池续航（长达100小时）
- 舒适轻巧的设计
缺点
- 长时间佩戴后耳垫不舒适
- 按钮感觉廉价且有咔嗒声
- 充电时无法使用
- 通透模式有闭塞感
- 降噪效果不如高端型号
Value for money 6
Noise cancellation 6
Sound quality 6
Battery life 4
Comfort 5
Build quality 4
Technics EAH-A800
82 满分 100 置信度中 11 条评价
Technics EAH-A800 耳机因其卓越的音质而获得压倒性的积极反馈，许多用户将其与有线耳机相媲美，尤其是在使用 LDAC 编解码器时。评论者称赞其佩戴舒适、主动降噪效果出色，以及能够营造出具有清晰立体声分离度的沉浸式声场。然而，少数用户报告了耐用性问题，例如头梁材料在一个月内松动以及一年后出现故障组件，而其他用户则建议进行小幅改进，例如更大的耳罩和更多的均衡器频段。
优点
- 卓越的音质
- 有效的主动降噪
- 佩戴舒适
- 沉浸式声场和立体声分离
- 支持 LDAC 编解码器，实现高品质音频
缺点
- 头梁材料的耐用性问题
- 一年后出现故障组件
- 耳罩可以稍大一些
- 头梁在头皮上感觉有点硬
- 只有 5 个均衡器频段（希望更多）
Sound quality 7
Build quality 2
Comfort 3
Anc performance 2
Ldac codec 3
Eq customization 2
评分
Work
Gaming
Budget
Calls
Commute
Studio
Music
规格
| SonoFlow HQ51 | Technics EAH-A800 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.53 kg | 0.30 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | protein leather | super-soft earpads |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | — | 4 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz | 40 kHz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 34 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 105 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | LDAC | AAC, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Technics - Wireless Noise Cancelling Over-Ear Headphones with 2 Device Multipoint Connectivity - EAH-A800-K Black | Technics - Wireless Noise Cancelling Over-Ear | Technics | Black | Over Ear | Over E |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | dual-feed | Dual Hybrid |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.4★ | 5.2 |
| Profiles | — | A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Cable Length | — | 1 m |
| Range | — | 10.100000381469727 m★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 100 hrs★ | 50 hrs |
| Charge Time | — | 3 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | 5-minute charge gives an extra 10 hours | 15 Minutes for 10 Hours |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 8★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Siri, Alexa |
| Touch Controls | — | ✗ |
| App | — | Technics Audio Connect |
优缺点
SonoFlow HQ51
- Strong battery (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong anc (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong connectivity (73rd percentile)
- Below average comfort (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Technics EAH-A800
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
价格
SonoFlow HQ510.035每美元得分
vs
Technics EAH-A8000.008每美元得分
SonoFlow HQ51 性价比高 4.4 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-A800
Scores 91 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 12 of 37 specs.
