Technics EAH-AZ80
Technics
86 综合评分
vs
Thore THR/V120RG
Thore
39 综合评分
买家怎么说
Technics EAH-AZ80
78 满分 100 置信度中 21 条评价
Technics EAH-AZ10 耳机因其卓越的音质获得了压倒性的积极反馈，具有清晰分离、宽广声场和自然调音，可与高端型号媲美。用户称赞其舒适稳固的贴合度、不会使音频浑浊的有效降噪以及长达7小时的出色电池续航。然而，一些批评性评论指出了触摸控制不灵敏的问题，一位用户在使用1.5年后出现了明显的音量不平衡，而公司仅提供10%的折扣用于更换。总体而言，强烈推荐给发烧友和日常使用，但潜在买家应意识到可能的耐用性和控制问题。
优点
- 卓越的音质，清晰分离
- 舒适稳固的贴合度
- 有效的降噪，不损失音质
- 长达7小时的出色电池续航
- 出色的通话质量
缺点
- 触摸控制不灵敏
- 长时间使用后音量不平衡
- 缺陷产品客户服务差
- 对某些用户来说设计笨重
- 在非常嘈杂的环境中降噪不足
Sound quality 10
Fit and comfort 7
Noise cancellation 7
Battery life 6
Call quality 4
Touch controls 2
Thore THR/V120RG
72 满分 100 置信度中 10 条评价
大多数用户对这些耳机非常满意，称赞其舒适度、音质和性价比。然而，一些批评性评论指出了严重的耐用性问题，例如一侧在一周内停止工作以及有缺陷的替换品。总体情绪是积极的，但被对长期可靠性的担忧所削弱。
优点
- 佩戴舒适
- 音质出色
- 性价比高
- 低音出色
- 轻巧设计
缺点
- 耐用性问题
- 左侧停止工作
- 替换单元有缺陷
- 客户服务差
- 退货流程困难
Comfort 4
Sound quality 5
Value for money 3
Durability 2
Customer service 1
Ease of use 2
评分
Calls
Commute
Music
Gaming
Travel
Budget
Fitness
规格
| Technics EAH-AZ80 | Thore THR/V120RG | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | Rounded |
| Ear Tips | XS, S, M, L, XL | 3 size ear gels |
| Weight | 0.01 kg★ | 0.04 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 10 mm | 11 mm★ |
| Drivers | 1 | 1 |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | AAC, LDAC, SBC | Lighting Earbuds, MFI Certified, Noise Isolation, Volume Control, Water Resistant |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | — |
| ANC Type | hybrid | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Profiles | A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Wired Connector | — | Lightning |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 7 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15 Minutes for 1.1 Hours | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | Lightning |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 16 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C★ | Lightning |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Capacity | 85 mAh★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 8★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Alexa, Siri | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Technics Audio Connect | iOS |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | — |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | Water-Resistant |
优缺点
Technics EAH-AZ80
- Strong mic (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong sound (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Below average affordability (10th percentile)10th %ile
Thore THR/V120RG
- Strong build (71st percentile)
- Strong comfort (70th percentile)
- Strong social proof (67th percentile)
- Below average anc (31st percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (34th percentile)
价格
Technics EAH-AZ800.018每美元得分
vs
Thore THR/V120RG0.077每美元得分
Thore THR/V120RG 性价比高 4.3 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ80
Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 18 of 37 specs.
