Technics EAH-AZ80
Technics
86 综合评分
vs
KZ ZS10 Pro
KZ
62 综合评分
买家怎么说
Technics EAH-AZ80
78 满分 100 置信度中 21 条评价
Technics EAH-AZ10 耳机因其卓越的音质获得了压倒性的积极反馈，具有清晰分离、宽广声场和自然调音，可与高端型号媲美。用户称赞其舒适稳固的贴合度、不会使音频浑浊的有效降噪以及长达7小时的出色电池续航。然而，一些批评性评论指出了触摸控制不灵敏的问题，一位用户在使用1.5年后出现了明显的音量不平衡，而公司仅提供10%的折扣用于更换。总体而言，强烈推荐给发烧友和日常使用，但潜在买家应意识到可能的耐用性和控制问题。
优点
- 卓越的音质，清晰分离
- 舒适稳固的贴合度
- 有效的降噪，不损失音质
- 长达7小时的出色电池续航
- 出色的通话质量
缺点
- 触摸控制不灵敏
- 长时间使用后音量不平衡
- 缺陷产品客户服务差
- 对某些用户来说设计笨重
- 在非常嘈杂的环境中降噪不足
Sound quality 10
Fit and comfort 7
Noise cancellation 7
Battery life 6
Call quality 4
Touch controls 2
KZ ZS10 Pro
88 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
KZ ZS10 Pro 入耳式耳机因其卓越的音质、宽广的声场和令人印象深刻的细节还原而获得压倒性的正面反馈，常常超越更昂贵的竞争对手。用户强调其出色的性价比、舒适的佩戴感以及适合打鼓和现场表演。一些小问题包括耳塞头偶尔脱落和线材耐用性问题，但总体满意度非常高。
优点
- 卓越的音质和细节
- 宽广的声场
- 出色的性价比
- 舒适的佩戴感
- 非常适合打鼓和现场表演
缺点
- 耳塞头偶尔脱落
- 线材耐用性问题
Sound quality 6
Value for money 4
Fit and comfort 3
Build quality 3
Cable durability 2
Suitability for drumming 2
评分
Calls
Commute
Music
Gaming
Travel
Budget
Fitness
规格
| Technics EAH-AZ80 | KZ ZS10 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | In Ear |
| Ear Tips | XS, S, M, L, XL | S, M, L |
| Weight | 0.01 kg★ | 0.06 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | hybrid |
| Driver Size | 10 mm | 10 mm |
| Drivers | 1 | 5★ |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 7 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz | 40 kHz |
| Impedance | — | 24 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 111 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | AAC, LDAC, SBC | KZ ZS10 Pro in Ear Monitor, 4BA+1DD Hybrid Driver IEM Earphones, HiFi Gaming Earbuds with Stainless Steel Faceplate, in Ear Headphone for Musician Audiophile (Without Mic, Black) |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | hybrid | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Profiles | A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 7 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15 Minutes for 1.1 Hours | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | proprietary |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 16 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Capacity | 85 mAh★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 8★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Alexa, Siri | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | — |
| App | Technics Audio Connect | — |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | IPX4 |
优缺点
Technics EAH-AZ80
- Strong mic (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong sound (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Below average affordability (11th percentile)11th %ile
KZ ZS10 Pro
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong build (79th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (26th percentile)
价格
Technics EAH-AZ800.018每美元得分
vs
KZ ZS10 Pro0.062每美元得分
KZ ZS10 Pro 性价比高 3.4 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ80
Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 16 of 38 specs.
