Samsung Galaxy Buds R170
Samsung
47 综合评分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ80
Technics
85 综合评分
买家怎么说
Samsung Galaxy Buds R170
65 满分 100 置信度中 15 条评价
三星 Galaxy Buds 从翻新买家那里收到了褒贬不一的反馈。许多人称赞其音质、舒适的佩戴感以及与三星手机的轻松配对，尤其是考虑到折扣价格。然而，一些用户报告翻新机到货时脏污、有划痕，或者一个耳机在几个月后出现故障，导致失望。电池续航总体足够但不出色，有些人觉得入耳式设计不舒服或容易掉落。
优点
- 出色的音质
- 佩戴舒适
- 蓝牙配对简单
- 翻新价格性价比高
- 入耳密封性好
缺点
- 翻新机经常脏污或有划痕
- 一个耳机可能在几个月后出现故障
- 部分设备电池续航短
- 对小耳朵不舒适
- 使用中耳机可能掉落
Sound quality 8
Fit and comfort 7
Battery life 6
Refurbished condition 5
Ease of pairing 5
Durability 3
Technics EAH-AZ80
78 满分 100 置信度中 21 条评价
Technics EAH-AZ10 耳机因其卓越的音质获得了压倒性的积极反馈，具有清晰分离、宽广声场和自然调音，可与高端型号媲美。用户称赞其舒适稳固的贴合度、不会使音频浑浊的有效降噪以及长达7小时的出色电池续航。然而，一些批评性评论指出了触摸控制不灵敏的问题，一位用户在使用1.5年后出现了明显的音量不平衡，而公司仅提供10%的折扣用于更换。总体而言，强烈推荐给发烧友和日常使用，但潜在买家应意识到可能的耐用性和控制问题。
优点
- 卓越的音质，清晰分离
- 舒适稳固的贴合度
- 有效的降噪，不损失音质
- 长达7小时的出色电池续航
- 出色的通话质量
缺点
- 触摸控制不灵敏
- 长时间使用后音量不平衡
- 缺陷产品客户服务差
- 对某些用户来说设计笨重
- 在非常嘈杂的环境中降噪不足
Sound quality 10
Fit and comfort 7
Noise cancellation 7
Battery life 6
Call quality 4
Touch controls 2
评分
Budget
Calls
Commute
Music
Gaming
Travel
Fitness
规格
| Samsung Galaxy Buds R170 | Technics EAH-AZ80 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | three adjustable ear tip and wingtip sizes | XS, S, M, L, XL |
| Weight | 0.04 kg★ | 0.05 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | Galaxy Buds True Wireless Earbuds (Wireless Charging Case included), White – US Version | AAC, LDAC, SBC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | hybrid |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 6 hrs | 7 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | 0.25 hrs★ | 2.5 hrs |
| Fast Charging | 3 minutes of charging gives you one hour of play time | 15 Minutes for 1.1 Hours |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 7 hrs | 16 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Capacity | — | 85 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 3 | 8★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Siri | Alexa, Siri |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Galaxy Wearable, Galaxy Buds+ | Technics Audio Connect |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX2 | IPX4 |
优缺点
Samsung Galaxy Buds R170
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong mic (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong comfort (73rd percentile)
- Strong connectivity (70th percentile)
- Below average battery (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average sound (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ80
- Strong mic (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
价格
Samsung Galaxy Buds R1700.038每美元得分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ800.018每美元得分
Samsung Galaxy Buds R170 性价比高 2.1 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ80
Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 36 specs.
