Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 综合评分
vs
Creative EF1190
Creative
68 综合评分
买家怎么说
Technics EAH-AZ100
92 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
用户对Technics EAH-AZ100耳机普遍持积极态度，称赞其卓越的音质，尤其是LDAC和杜比全景声，以及令人惊讶的有效AI通话降噪功能，可以屏蔽尖叫的孩子或洗车等背景噪音。舒适度、通过应用程序进行定制以及可靠的电池续航也受到强调。唯一提到的潜在缺点是价格较高，但大多数人认为高端功能物有所值。
优点
- LDAC带来的卓越音质
- AI通话降噪
- 长时间佩戴舒适贴合
- 通过应用程序可自定义均衡器
- 可靠的电池续航
缺点
- 价格较高
- ANC比AZ80稍弱
Sound quality 8
Call quality 2
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 4
Battery life 2
Value for money 3
Creative EF1190
暂无用户反馈
评分
Budget
Travel
Calls
Commute
Music
Gaming
Fitness
规格
| Technics EAH-AZ100 | Creative EF1190 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | 5 x Eartip Pairs | S, M, L |
| Weight | 0.05 kg | 0.04 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 10 mm | 10 mm |
| Drivers | 1 | 10★ |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC | AAC |
| Surround | Dolby Atmos | Creative Zen SXFI Air Wireless In-Ear Headphones - Black | Creative Labs | Zen Air SXFI | 51EF1180AA000 | True Wireless | Black | Charging Case: 40g (1.41 oz)(Per earbud): 5.45g (0.19 oz) | (Per earbu |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Profiles | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP | A2DP, AVRCP |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | — |
| Range | 10 m | 10 m |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs | 12 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15 min. for 90 min. playback | — |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 28 hrs | 39 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Capacity | — | 60 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 6 | 6 |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | Siri, Google Assistant |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Android & iOS | Creative App |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | IPX5 |
优缺点
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
Creative EF1190
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong sound (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Below average social proof (22nd percentile)
价格
Technics EAH-AZ1000.015每美元得分
vs
Creative EF11900.054每美元得分
Creative EF1190 性价比高 3.6 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 3 of 40 specs.
