MEE audio M6-R3
MEE audio
35 综合评分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 综合评分
买家怎么说
MEE audio M6-R3
65 满分 100 置信度中 11 条评价
MEE audio M6 有线耳机收到褒贬不一的反馈。许多用户称赞其耐用性、舒适的耳挂式贴合度以及价格合理的良好音质，尤其适合运动和有声读物。然而，一些评论报告了麦克风故障、廉价的耳挂线和僵硬的线缆问题，有些设备在几周内就坏了。
优点
- 价格合理的良好音质
- 舒适的耳挂式贴合度
- L型插头耐用
- 运动时能固定在耳朵里
- 音量控制和暂停/播放
缺点
- 麦克风故障或有回声
- 廉价脆弱的耳挂线
- 僵硬且不灵活的线缆
- 有些在几周内就坏了
- 耳机方向可能有缺陷
Build quality 6
Microphone quality 3
Sound quality 5
Comfort and fit 5
Durability 4
Value for money 4
Technics EAH-AZ100
92 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
用户对Technics EAH-AZ100耳机普遍持积极态度，称赞其卓越的音质，尤其是LDAC和杜比全景声，以及令人惊讶的有效AI通话降噪功能，可以屏蔽尖叫的孩子或洗车等背景噪音。舒适度、通过应用程序进行定制以及可靠的电池续航也受到强调。唯一提到的潜在缺点是价格较高，但大多数人认为高端功能物有所值。
优点
- LDAC带来的卓越音质
- AI通话降噪
- 长时间佩戴舒适贴合
- 通过应用程序可自定义均衡器
- 可靠的电池续航
缺点
- 价格较高
- ANC比AZ80稍弱
Sound quality 8
Call quality 2
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 4
Battery life 2
Value for money 3
评分
Budget
Travel
Calls
Commute
Music
Gaming
Fitness
规格
| MEE audio M6-R3 | Technics EAH-AZ100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | — | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | 6 sets of eartips | 5 x Eartip Pairs |
| Weight | 0.02 kg★ | 0.05 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 3.5 mm | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | MEE Audio M6 Sport Wired Earbuds, in Ear Headphones, 3-Button Remote, Sweatproof Earphones for Running/Gym/Workouts with Memory Wire Earhooks, Headset Microphone, 3.5mm Jack Plug (Black) | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Dolby Atmos |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | Bluetooth |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 8 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15 min. for 90 min. playback |
| Charging | proprietary | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 28 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 6★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | — | Android & iOS |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX5 | IPX4 |
优缺点
MEE audio M6-R3
- Strong comfort (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average sound (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average user sentiment (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average anc (31st percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
价格
MEE audio M6-R30.077每美元得分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ1000.015每美元得分
MEE audio M6-R3 性价比高 5.1 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 19 of 39 specs.
