JBL Live Beam 3
JBL
84 综合评分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ80
Technics
86 综合评分
买家怎么说
JBL Live Beam 3
72 满分 100 置信度中 11 条评价
JBL Live Flex 3 耳机因其出色的音质、舒适的佩戴感和耐用的构造而获得大多正面评价。用户欣赏带有屏幕的创新充电盒和有效的降噪功能，尽管有些人报告了电池续航、配对和偶尔的软件错误问题。一些评论提到充电盒较大且价格偏高，但总体而言，该产品被视为可靠且功能丰富的选择。
优点
- 出色的音质
- 舒适的佩戴感
- 耐用的构造
- 带屏幕的创新充电盒
- 有效的降噪
缺点
- 电池续航比宣传短
- 配对问题
- 充电盒发出哔哔声
- 耳内响亮的敲击声
- 充电盒较大
Sound quality 7
Battery life 6
Case design 5
Noise cancelling 4
Durability 3
Pairing connectivity 3
Technics EAH-AZ80
78 满分 100 置信度中 21 条评价
Technics EAH-AZ10 耳机因其卓越的音质获得了压倒性的积极反馈，具有清晰分离、宽广声场和自然调音，可与高端型号媲美。用户称赞其舒适稳固的贴合度、不会使音频浑浊的有效降噪以及长达7小时的出色电池续航。然而，一些批评性评论指出了触摸控制不灵敏的问题，一位用户在使用1.5年后出现了明显的音量不平衡，而公司仅提供10%的折扣用于更换。总体而言，强烈推荐给发烧友和日常使用，但潜在买家应意识到可能的耐用性和控制问题。
优点
- 卓越的音质，清晰分离
- 舒适稳固的贴合度
- 有效的降噪，不损失音质
- 长达7小时的出色电池续航
- 出色的通话质量
缺点
- 触摸控制不灵敏
- 长时间使用后音量不平衡
- 缺陷产品客户服务差
- 对某些用户来说设计笨重
- 在非常嘈杂的环境中降噪不足
Sound quality 10
Fit and comfort 7
Noise cancellation 7
Battery life 6
Call quality 4
Touch controls 2
评分
Calls
Commute
Travel
Fitness
Music
Gaming
Budget
规格
| JBL Live Beam 3 | Technics EAH-AZ80 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | XS, S, M, L | XS, S, M, L, XL |
| Weight | 0.01 kg★ | 0.01 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 10 mm | 10 mm |
| Drivers | 1 | 1 |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz | 40 kHz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB★ | — |
| Max SPL | 96 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | SBC, AAC | AAC, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | Spatial Audio | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | hybrid |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Profiles | A2DP 1.4, AVRCP, HFP 1.8 | A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Range | 10.100000381469727 m★ | 10 m |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 12 hrs★ | 7 hrs |
| Charge Time | 2 hrs★ | 2.5 hrs |
| Fast Charging | 10min=4hrs | 15 Minutes for 1.1 Hours |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 48 hrs★ | 16 hrs |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Capacity | 68 mAh | 85 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 6 | 8★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Assistant, Amazon Alexa | Alexa, Siri |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | JBL Headphones | Technics Audio Connect |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IP55 | IPX4 |
优缺点
JBL Live Beam 3
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong comfort (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average affordability (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (34th percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ80
- Strong mic (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong sound (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Below average affordability (10th percentile)10th %ile
价格
JBL Live Beam 30.037每美元得分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ800.018每美元得分
JBL Live Beam 3 性价比高 2.1 倍
结论
胜出: JBL Live Beam 3
Scores 84 overall, wins 3 of 7 usage categories and 7 of 40 specs.
