Sennheiser CX 150BT
Sennheiser
53 综合评分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 综合评分
买家怎么说
Sennheiser CX 150BT
暂无用户反馈
Technics EAH-AZ100
88 满分 100 置信度中 28 条评价
Technics EAH-AZ100 耳机因其卓越的音质而广受赞誉，用户强调深沉的低音、清晰的高音和沉浸式音频。舒适度、电池续航和降噪功能也经常受到称赞，尽管一些用户指出价格较高且音量有限。提到了蓝牙 LE 断开和初始多设备配对等小问题，但总体情绪非常积极。
优点
- 卓越的音质
- 深沉沉浸式低音
- 有效的降噪功能
- 舒适的佩戴感
- 出色的电池续航
缺点
- 价格较高
- 最大音量有限
- 蓝牙 LE 断开
- 多设备配对问题
- 塑料外壳
Sound quality 12
Bass performance 6
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 6
Battery life 5
Value for money 4
评分
Calls
Travel
Music
Commute
Gaming
Budget
Fitness
规格
| Sennheiser CX 150BT | Technics EAH-AZ100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | XS, S, M, L | 5 x Eartip Pairs |
| Weight | 0.01 kg | 0.01 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | 17 Hz★ | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 28 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 112 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | SBC, AAC | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Dolby Atmos, Spatial Audio |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | USB-C | Bluetooth |
| Range | 10 m | 10 m |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 10 hrs★ | 8 hrs |
| Charge Time | 1 hrs★ | 2.5 hrs |
| Fast Charging | fast USB-C charging | 15 min. for 90 min. playback |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 28 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 6★ |
| NC Mic | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Touch Controls | ✗ | ✓★ |
| App | Sennheiser Smart Control App | Android & iOS |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | Water-Resistant | IPX4 |
优缺点
Sennheiser CX 150BT
- Strong comfort (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong connectivity (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong sound (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong build (71st percentile)
- Below average battery (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average anc (31st percentile)
- Below average affordability (34th percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
价格
Sennheiser CX 150BT0.042每美元得分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ1000.012每美元得分
Sennheiser CX 150BT 性价比高 3.5 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 40 specs.
