Technics EAH-AZ100-N
Technics
100 综合评分
vs
Sennheiser CX 300S Black
Sennheiser
44 综合评分
买家怎么说
Technics EAH-AZ100-N
92 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
Technics EAH-AZ100 耳机因其出色的音质（尤其是使用 LDAC 和杜比全景声时）而获得压倒性的积极反馈。用户强调其基于 AI 的通话降噪功能出奇地有效，可以屏蔽尖叫的孩子或洗车等背景噪音。通过应用程序实现的舒适性和自定义功能也受到称赞，尽管有些人指出其主动降噪比之前的 AZ80 型号稍弱。
优点
- 使用 LDAC 的出色音质
- AI 通话降噪
- 长时间佩戴舒适
- 通过应用程序自定义均衡器
- 有效的主动降噪和通透模式
缺点
- 价格较高（300美元）
- 主动降噪比 AZ80 稍弱
- 触控需要适应
Sound quality 8
Call quality 3
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 4
Battery life 2
Value for money 3
Sennheiser CX 300S Black
68 满分 100 置信度中 12 条评价
Sennheiser CX 300S 耳塞凭借清晰均衡的音质、坚固的构造和防缠绕的线缆获得了大部分正面评价。然而，多条评论指出了耐用性问题，例如耳塞从外壳脱落或硅胶耳塞掉落。尽管音质广受好评，但对长期可靠性的担忧以及一些糟糕客服体验的报告削弱了整体热情。
优点
- 清晰均衡的音质
- 坚固的构造
- 防缠绕线缆
- 佩戴舒适
- 物有所值
缺点
- 耐用性问题（耳塞脱落）
- 硅胶耳塞脱落
- 低音表现不一致
- 数月后外壳开裂
- 客户服务/保修差劲
Sound quality 11
Build quality 5
Durability 5
Comfort 5
Value for money 6
Cable tangle free 3
评分
Travel
Budget
Calls
Music
Commute
Gaming
Fitness
规格
| Technics EAH-AZ100-N | Sennheiser CX 300S Black | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | in-ear |
| Ear Tips | Extra large, Large, Medium, Small | XS, S, M, L |
| Weight | 0.05 kg | 0.01 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | — |
| Driver Size | 10 mm★ | — |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 17 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | 21 kHz |
| Impedance | — | 18 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 118 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC | — |
| Surround | Dolby Atmos | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | — |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Profiles | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | 3.5mm |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15 min. for 90 min. playback | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | proprietary |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 28 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C★ | proprietary |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 6★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Android & iOS | — |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | — |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | — |
优缺点
Technics EAH-AZ100-N
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
Sennheiser CX 300S Black
- Strong comfort (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (73rd percentile)
- Strong sound (69th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (21st percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
价格
Technics EAH-AZ100-N0.010每美元得分
vs
Sennheiser CX 300S Black0.070每美元得分
Sennheiser CX 300S Black 性价比高 7.0 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100-N
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 40 specs.
