Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 综合评分
vs
Skullcandy Mod S2FYW-P751
Skullcandy
51 综合评分
买家怎么说
Technics EAH-AZ100
92 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
用户对Technics EAH-AZ100耳机普遍持积极态度，称赞其卓越的音质，尤其是LDAC和杜比全景声，以及令人惊讶的有效AI通话降噪功能，可以屏蔽尖叫的孩子或洗车等背景噪音。舒适度、通过应用程序进行定制以及可靠的电池续航也受到强调。唯一提到的潜在缺点是价格较高，但大多数人认为高端功能物有所值。
优点
- LDAC带来的卓越音质
- AI通话降噪
- 长时间佩戴舒适贴合
- 通过应用程序可自定义均衡器
- 可靠的电池续航
缺点
- 价格较高
- ANC比AZ80稍弱
Sound quality 8
Call quality 2
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 4
Battery life 2
Value for money 3
Skullcandy Mod S2FYW-P751
72 满分 100 置信度中 12 条评价
Skullcandy Dime 3 耳塞收到了褒贬不一的反馈。许多用户称赞其价格下出色的音质、舒适的佩戴感以及多设备配对和 Tile 追踪等实用功能。然而，一些评论强调了严重的耐用性问题，特别是充电盒铰链断裂，部分用户还报告低音不足、蓝牙范围弱以及几个月后一只耳塞出现故障。
优点
- 价格下出色的音质
- 舒适且稳固的佩戴
- 多设备配对效果很好
- 电池续航好且充电快
- 实用的 Tile 追踪功能
缺点
- 充电盒铰链容易断裂
- 对部分用户来说低音不足
- 蓝牙范围差
- 几个月后一只耳塞停止工作
- 运动时耳塞会掉落
Sound quality 8
Build quality 4
Battery life 4
Bluetooth connectivity 3
Comfort and fit 4
Multi device pairing 3
评分
Budget
Travel
Calls
Commute
Music
Gaming
Fitness
规格
| Technics EAH-AZ100 | Skullcandy Mod S2FYW-P751 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | 5 x Eartip Pairs | S, M, L |
| Weight | 0.05 kg★ | 0.06 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 10 mm★ | 6 mm |
| Drivers | 1 | 1 |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 95 dB★ |
| Max SPL | — | 95 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC | Skullcandy Mod Wireless Earbuds, Bluetooth Headphones, Up to 32 Hours Battery, Noise Isolating Fit, Sweat and Water Resistant, Microphone for iPhone Android - Light Grey/Blue |
| Surround | Dolby Atmos | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | — |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | 5.2 |
| Profiles | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | — |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs★ | 7 hrs |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15 min. for 90 min. playback | 10 Minutes for 2 Hours |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 28 hrs | 34 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 6★ | 2 |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Android & iOS | Skull-iQ |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | IP55 |
优缺点
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
Skullcandy Mod S2FYW-P751
- Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong connectivity (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong battery (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong social proof (73rd percentile)
- Below average sound (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (33rd percentile)
价格
Technics EAH-AZ1000.015每美元得分
vs
Skullcandy Mod S2FYW-P7510.055每美元得分
Skullcandy Mod S2FYW-P751 性价比高 3.7 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 12 of 41 specs.
