Technics EAH-AZ100-N
Technics
100 综合评分
vs
Creative Aurvana Ace EF1150
Creative
61 综合评分
买家怎么说
Technics EAH-AZ100-N
92 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
Technics EAH-AZ100 耳机因其出色的音质（尤其是使用 LDAC 和杜比全景声时）而获得压倒性的积极反馈。用户强调其基于 AI 的通话降噪功能出奇地有效，可以屏蔽尖叫的孩子或洗车等背景噪音。通过应用程序实现的舒适性和自定义功能也受到称赞，尽管有些人指出其主动降噪比之前的 AZ80 型号稍弱。
优点
- 使用 LDAC 的出色音质
- AI 通话降噪
- 长时间佩戴舒适
- 通过应用程序自定义均衡器
- 有效的主动降噪和通透模式
缺点
- 价格较高（300美元）
- 主动降噪比 AZ80 稍弱
- 触控需要适应
Sound quality 8
Call quality 3
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 4
Battery life 2
Value for money 3
Creative Aurvana Ace EF1150
暂无用户反馈
评分
Travel
Budget
Calls
Commute
Music
Gaming
Fitness
规格
| Technics EAH-AZ100-N | Creative Aurvana Ace EF1150 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | Extra large, Large, Medium, Small | — |
| Weight | 0.05 kg★ | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | MEMS |
| Driver Size | 10 mm | 10 mm |
| Drivers | 1 | 2★ |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC | aptX Adaptive, AAC |
| Surround | Dolby Atmos | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | hybrid |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Profiles | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | — |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs★ | 6 hrs |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15 min. for 90 min. playback | 5 minutes charging delivers a full hour of use |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 28 hrs★ | 24 hrs |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 6 | 6 |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | Siri, Google Assistant |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Android & iOS | — |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | — |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | IPX5 |
优缺点
Technics EAH-AZ100-N
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
Creative Aurvana Ace EF1150
- Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average comfort (29th percentile)
价格
Technics EAH-AZ100-N0.010每美元得分
vs
Creative Aurvana Ace EF11500.054每美元得分
Creative Aurvana Ace EF1150 性价比高 5.4 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100-N
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 9 of 38 specs.
