Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 综合评分
vs
Sennheiser IE 200
Sennheiser
33 综合评分
买家怎么说
Technics EAH-AZ100
88 满分 100 置信度中 28 条评价
Technics EAH-AZ100 耳机因其卓越的音质而广受赞誉，用户强调深沉的低音、清晰的高音和沉浸式音频。舒适度、电池续航和降噪功能也经常受到称赞，尽管一些用户指出价格较高且音量有限。提到了蓝牙 LE 断开和初始多设备配对等小问题，但总体情绪非常积极。
优点
- 卓越的音质
- 深沉沉浸式低音
- 有效的降噪功能
- 舒适的佩戴感
- 出色的电池续航
缺点
- 价格较高
- 最大音量有限
- 蓝牙 LE 断开
- 多设备配对问题
- 塑料外壳
Sound quality 12
Bass performance 6
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 6
Battery life 5
Value for money 4
Sennheiser IE 200
72 满分 100 置信度中 16 条评价
Sennheiser IE 200 入耳式耳机因其清晰细腻的声音和卓越的舒适度而普遍获得好评，许多用户称赞其轻巧的设计和长时间聆听不疲劳。然而，相当多的评论者指出，即使经过调整，低音仍然不足，而且线材具有麦克风效应，使其不太适合活动使用。虽然有些人认为其音质可与录音室耳机媲美，但另一些人则对平淡的低音感到失望，并认为价格过高。
优点
- 声音清晰细腻
- 卓越的舒适度和轻便性
- 长时间聆听不疲劳
- 适合移动音乐制作
- 均衡器调节效果好
缺点
- 即使调整后低音仍不足
- 线材麦克风效应噪音
- 耳挂式需要适应
- 对某些人来说价格偏高
- 不适合活动使用或锻炼
Sound quality 7
Bass performance 4
Comfort 6
Cable noise 2
Value for money 3
Fit and design 4
评分
Budget
Travel
Calls
Commute
Music
Gaming
Fitness
规格
| Technics EAH-AZ100 | Sennheiser IE 200 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | ear-hook |
| Ear Tips | 5 x Eartip Pairs | S, M, L |
| Weight | 0.05 kg★ | 0.09 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 10 mm★ | 7 mm |
| Drivers | 1 | 1 |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 6 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 18 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 119 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC | Sennheiser Consumer Audio IE 200 In-Ear Audiophile Headphones - TrueResponse Transducers for Neutral Sound, Impactful Bass, Detachable Braided Cable with Flexible Ear Hooks - Black |
| Surround | Dolby Atmos | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Profiles | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | — |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15 min. for 90 min. playback | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | proprietary |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 28 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C★ | proprietary |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Mic Count | 6★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | ✗ |
| App | Android & iOS | — |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | — |
优缺点
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
Sennheiser IE 200
- Strong sound (79th percentile)
- Strong comfort (72nd percentile)
- Below average mic (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average connectivity (28th percentile)
- Below average anc (31st percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (33rd percentile)
价格
Technics EAH-AZ100
Sennheiser IE 200
No current pricing available
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 18 of 40 specs.
