Technics EAH-AZ100-N

Technics EAH-AZ100-N

Technics
100 综合评分
vs
BENEWY ME542

BENEWY ME542

BENEWY
56 综合评分

买家怎么说

Technics EAH-AZ100-N

92 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价

Technics EAH-AZ100 耳机因其出色的音质(尤其是使用 LDAC 和杜比全景声时)而获得压倒性的积极反馈。用户强调其基于 AI 的通话降噪功能出奇地有效,可以屏蔽尖叫的孩子或洗车等背景噪音。通过应用程序实现的舒适性和自定义功能也受到称赞,尽管有些人指出其主动降噪比之前的 AZ80 型号稍弱。

优点
  • 使用 LDAC 的出色音质
  • AI 通话降噪
  • 长时间佩戴舒适
  • 通过应用程序自定义均衡器
  • 有效的主动降噪和通透模式
缺点
  • 价格较高(300美元)
  • 主动降噪比 AZ80 稍弱
  • 触控需要适应
👍 Sound quality 8
👍 Call quality 3
🤔 Noise cancellation 5
👍 Comfort 4
👍 Battery life 2
🤔 Value for money 3

BENEWY ME542

85 满分 100 置信度中 12 条评价

这些Type-C耳机因其扎实的音质、舒适的佩戴感和令人印象深刻的耐用性而广受好评——有一副甚至经受住了洗衣机的洗涤。用户喜欢附带的收纳盒以及与三星设备的即插即用便利性。一些人指出,在剧烈运动时耳塞可能会脱落,而且音质虽然对得起价格,但并非发烧友级别。总体而言,它们为日常使用提供了极佳的性价比。

优点
  • 价格合理的良好音质
  • 橡胶耳塞佩戴舒适
  • 耐用结构,经得起洗衣机考验
  • 附带紧凑收纳盒
  • 与三星设备轻松即插即用
缺点
  • 剧烈运动时耳塞会脱落
  • 音乐音质仅算一般
  • USB-C接口可能随时间变得不稳定
  • 控制按钮在线上位置过高
  • 不适合发烧友
👍 Sound quality 10
🤔 Comfort and fit 7
👍 Durability 5
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Ease of use 4
👍 Build quality 5

评分

Travel
Technics
94
BENEWY
32
Budget
Technics
93
BENEWY
63
Calls
Technics
92
BENEWY
38
Music
Technics
90
BENEWY
50
Commute
Technics
89
BENEWY
32
Gaming
Technics
88
BENEWY
51
Fitness
Technics
78
BENEWY
35

规格

Technics EAH-AZ100-NBENEWY ME542
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelesshalf-in-ear
Ear TipsExtra large, Large, Medium, Small—
Weight0.05 kg0.03 kg★
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm14.199999809265137 mm★
Drivers1★—
Freq Min20 Hz20 Hz
Freq Max40 kHz★20 kHz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity—110 dB★
Hi-Res Audio✓✓
CodecsAAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC—
SurroundDolby Atmos—
Noise Control
ANC✓★✗
ANC Typeadaptive—
Transparency✓★✗
Connectivity
Wireless✓★✗
Bluetooth5.3★—
ProfilesAVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP—
Multipoint✓★✗
Wired ConnectorBluetooth—
Range10 m★—
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs★—
Charge Time2.5 hrs★—
Fast Charging15 min. for 90 min. playback—
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery28 hrs★—
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging✓★✗
Microphone
Microphone✓✓
Mic Count6★2
NC Mic✓✓
Features
Voice AssistantGoogle Assistant, Sirivoice assistant
Touch Controls✓✓
AppAndroid & iOS—
Volume Limiting✗—
Gaming Mode✗✗
Bone Conduction✗✗
Water ResistanceIPX4—

优缺点

Technics EAH-AZ100-N

  • Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile

BENEWY ME542

  • Strong comfort (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong sound (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong mic (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average anc (31st percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

价格

BENEWY ME542 is MX$10,110 cheaper (28.8x less).

Technics EAH-AZ100-N0.010每美元得分
vs
BENEWY ME5420.155每美元得分

BENEWY ME542 性价比高 15.5 倍

Technics EAH-AZ100-N

BENEWY ME542

结论

★ 胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100-N

Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 40 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ100-N 更擅长:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

也值得考虑