Sennheiser ACCENTUM True Wireless
Sennheiser
79 综合评分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 综合评分
买家怎么说
Sennheiser ACCENTUM True Wireless
78 满分 100 置信度低 6 条评价
总体而言，用户对这些耳机的音质、舒适度和电池续航感到满意，多人称赞其稳固贴合和易于配对。然而，一位已验证的评论者认为即使半价也勉强可以接受，并表示不会支付220美元的全价。一位推广评论者指出触控操作有些不便，且没有主动降噪功能，但总体上仍推荐给优先考虑音质和设计的发烧友。
优点
- 出色的音质
- 舒适稳固的佩戴
- 电池续航长
- 与手机轻松配对
- 麦克风清晰
缺点
- 全价高昂
- 触控操作不灵敏
- 无主动降噪
- 部分用户电池续航仅4小时
Sound quality 5
Comfort fit 4
Battery life 4
Value for money 2
Connectivity 3
Touch controls 1
Technics EAH-AZ100
92 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
用户对Technics EAH-AZ100耳机普遍持积极态度，称赞其卓越的音质，尤其是LDAC和杜比全景声，以及令人惊讶的有效AI通话降噪功能，可以屏蔽尖叫的孩子或洗车等背景噪音。舒适度、通过应用程序进行定制以及可靠的电池续航也受到强调。唯一提到的潜在缺点是价格较高，但大多数人认为高端功能物有所值。
优点
- LDAC带来的卓越音质
- AI通话降噪
- 长时间佩戴舒适贴合
- 通过应用程序可自定义均衡器
- 可靠的电池续航
缺点
- 价格较高
- ANC比AZ80稍弱
Sound quality 8
Call quality 2
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 4
Battery life 2
Value for money 3
评分
Budget
Travel
Calls
Commute
Music
Gaming
Fitness
规格
| Sennheiser ACCENTUM True Wireless | Technics EAH-AZ100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | Extra small, Large, Medium, Small | 5 x Eartip Pairs |
| Weight | 0.01 kg★ | 0.05 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 7 mm | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | 1 | 1 |
| Freq Min | 5 Hz★ | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 21 kHz | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 140 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 107 dB★ | — |
| Max SPL | 107 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | AAC, aptX, LC3, SBC | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Dolby Atmos |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | hybrid | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Profiles | AVRCP, A2DP, HFP, TMAP, PBP | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP |
| Multipoint | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | USB | Bluetooth |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Charge Time | 1.5 hrs★ | 2.5 hrs |
| Fast Charging | 10 Minutes for 1 Hour | 15 min. for 90 min. playback |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 28 hrs | 28 hrs |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Capacity | 55 mAh★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 4 | 6★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Siri, Google Assistant | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Sennheiser Smart Control App | Android & iOS |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IP54 | IPX4 |
优缺点
Sennheiser ACCENTUM True Wireless
- Strong sound (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong comfort (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong connectivity (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
价格
Sennheiser ACCENTUM True Wireless0.022每美元得分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ1000.015每美元得分
Sennheiser ACCENTUM True Wireless 性价比高 1.5 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 5 of 42 specs.
