Technics EAH-AZ100-N
Technics
100 综合评分
vs
JBL Live Pro 2 JBLLIVEPRO2TWSBAM
JBL
79 综合评分
买家怎么说
Technics EAH-AZ100-N
92 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
Technics EAH-AZ100 耳机因其出色的音质（尤其是使用 LDAC 和杜比全景声时）而获得压倒性的积极反馈。用户强调其基于 AI 的通话降噪功能出奇地有效，可以屏蔽尖叫的孩子或洗车等背景噪音。通过应用程序实现的舒适性和自定义功能也受到称赞，尽管有些人指出其主动降噪比之前的 AZ80 型号稍弱。
优点
- 使用 LDAC 的出色音质
- AI 通话降噪
- 长时间佩戴舒适
- 通过应用程序自定义均衡器
- 有效的主动降噪和通透模式
缺点
- 价格较高（300美元）
- 主动降噪比 AZ80 稍弱
- 触控需要适应
Sound quality 8
Call quality 3
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 4
Battery life 2
Value for money 3
JBL Live Pro 2 JBLLIVEPRO2TWSBAM
62 满分 100 置信度高 112 条评价
JBL Live Pro 2 TWS 耳机的反馈褒贬不一。许多用户称赞音质、低音、降噪和耐用性，有些人指出它们经受住了洗衣机或火灾等极端条件。然而，相当多的评论者报告了佩戴问题（耳机掉落）、由阳光或风触发的触摸控制、蓝牙连接问题以及可靠性问题，例如一只耳机死亡或随时间推移声音变小。电池续航也是一个常见的抱怨，许多用户发现它比预期的要短。
优点
- 出色的音质
- 强劲的低音
- 有效的降噪
- 耐用的构造
- 舒适的佩戴
缺点
- 耳机掉落
- 触摸控制被光触发
- 蓝牙连接问题
- 一只耳机死亡或声音变小
- 电池续航比预期短
Sound quality 25
Battery life 15
Fit and comfort 12
Noise cancellation 10
Touch controls 8
Bluetooth connectivity 7
评分
Travel
Budget
Calls
Music
Commute
Gaming
Fitness
规格
| Technics EAH-AZ100-N | JBL Live Pro 2 JBLLIVEPRO2TWSBAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | Extra large, Large, Medium, Small | 3x Different-Sized Pair of Ear Tips |
| Weight | 0.05 kg★ | 0.06 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 10 mm | 11 mm★ |
| Drivers | 1 | 1 |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Codecs | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC | SBC, AAC |
| Surround | Dolby Atmos | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | 5.2 |
| Profiles | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP | A2DP 1.3, AVRCP 1.6, HFP 1.7 |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5 |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs | 10 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | 15 min. for 90 min. playback | 15 min for 4 hours playback |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 28 hrs | 40 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 6 | 6 |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | Hey Google or Alexa |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Android & iOS | JBL Headphones App |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | IPX5 |
优缺点
Technics EAH-AZ100-N
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
JBL Live Pro 2 JBLLIVEPRO2TWSBAM
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average user sentiment (11th percentile)11th %ile
价格
Technics EAH-AZ100-N0.010每美元得分
vs
JBL Live Pro 2 JBLLIVEPRO2TWSBAM0.043每美元得分
JBL Live Pro 2 JBLLIVEPRO2TWSBAM 性价比高 4.3 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100-N
Scores 100 overall, wins 6 of 7 usage categories and 5 of 39 specs.
