ICESOMNUS X12 PRO

ICESOMNUS X12 PRO

ICESOMNUS
50 综合评分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics
100 综合评分

买家怎么说

ICESOMNUS X12 PRO

78 满分 100 置信度低 7 条评价

用户称赞这些耳塞佩戴稳固、自动连接以及价格合理的良好音质。然而,有些人觉得它们太大或不舒适,还有关于廉价塑料结构和连接问题的投诉。耳翼被认为太软而无效,光泽外壳容易刮花。

优点
  • 稳固贴合,不易脱落
  • 自动蓝牙连接
  • 价格合理的良好音质
  • 对耳部感染用户舒适
  • 附带USB-C充电线
缺点
  • 对某些耳朵来说太大
  • 廉价塑料制造质量
  • 一侧断连的连接问题
  • 耳翼太软无效
  • 光泽外壳容易刮花
🤔 Fit and comfort 6
👎 Build quality 3
👍 Sound quality 5
🤔 Connectivity 3
👍 Battery life 3
👎 Ear wings 2

Technics EAH-AZ100

88 满分 100 置信度中 28 条评价

Technics EAH-AZ100 耳机因其卓越的音质而广受赞誉,用户强调深沉的低音、清晰的高音和沉浸式音频。舒适度、电池续航和降噪功能也经常受到称赞,尽管一些用户指出价格较高且音量有限。提到了蓝牙 LE 断开和初始多设备配对等小问题,但总体情绪非常积极。

优点
  • 卓越的音质
  • 深沉沉浸式低音
  • 有效的降噪功能
  • 舒适的佩戴感
  • 出色的电池续航
缺点
  • 价格较高
  • 最大音量有限
  • 蓝牙 LE 断开
  • 多设备配对问题
  • 塑料外壳
👍 Sound quality 12
👍 Bass performance 6
👍 Noise cancellation 5
👍 Comfort 6
👍 Battery life 5
🤔 Value for money 4

评分

Budget
ICESOMNUS
51
Technics
99
Travel
ICESOMNUS
33
Technics
95
Calls
ICESOMNUS
43
Technics
93
Commute
ICESOMNUS
31
Technics
90
Music
ICESOMNUS
43
Technics
90
Gaming
ICESOMNUS
59
Technics
88
Fitness
ICESOMNUS
46
Technics
80

规格

ICESOMNUS X12 PROTechnics EAH-AZ100
Design
Form Factorsemi-in-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelesstrue wireless
Ear TipsS, M, L5 x Eartip Pairs
Weight0.27 kg0.05 kg★
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm10 mm
Drivers11
Freq Min20 Hz20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz40 kHz★
Impedance32 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity101 dB★—
Hi-Res Audio—✓★
CodecsaptX, AACAAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC
Surround—Dolby Atmos
Noise Control
ANC✗✓★
ANC Type—adaptive
Transparency✗✓★
Connectivity
Wireless✓✓
Bluetooth5.4★5.3
ProfilesHSP, HFP, A2DP, AVRCPAVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP
Multipoint—✓★
Wired Connector—Bluetooth
Range—10 m★
Earbud Battery
Battery Life6 hrs8 hrs★
Charge Time1 hrs★2.5 hrs
Fast Charging—15 min. for 90 min. playback
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery30 hrs★28 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging—✓★
Microphone
Microphone✓✓
Mic Count46★
NC Mic✓✓
Features
Voice AssistantSiri, Android Voice AssistantGoogle Assistant, Siri
Touch Controls✓✓
App—Android & iOS
Volume Limiting—✗
Gaming Mode✓★✗
Bone Conduction—✗
Water ResistanceIPX5IPX4

优缺点

ICESOMNUS X12 PRO

  • Strong mic (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong sound (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average battery (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average comfort (29th percentile)
  • Below average anc (31st percentile)

Technics EAH-AZ100

  • Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile

价格

ICESOMNUS X12 PRO is MX$5,841 cheaper (7.4x less).

ICESOMNUS X12 PRO0.055每美元得分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ1000.015每美元得分

ICESOMNUS X12 PRO 性价比高 3.7 倍

ICESOMNUS X12 PRO

Technics EAH-AZ100

结论

★ 胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100

Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 10 of 40 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ100 更擅长:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

也值得考虑