Technics EAH-AZ100-N
Technics
100 综合评分
vs
CCA CRA PRO
CCA
41 综合评分
买家怎么说
Technics EAH-AZ100-N
92 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
Technics EAH-AZ100 耳机因其出色的音质（尤其是使用 LDAC 和杜比全景声时）而获得压倒性的积极反馈。用户强调其基于 AI 的通话降噪功能出奇地有效，可以屏蔽尖叫的孩子或洗车等背景噪音。通过应用程序实现的舒适性和自定义功能也受到称赞，尽管有些人指出其主动降噪比之前的 AZ80 型号稍弱。
优点
- 使用 LDAC 的出色音质
- AI 通话降噪
- 长时间佩戴舒适
- 通过应用程序自定义均衡器
- 有效的主动降噪和通透模式
缺点
- 价格较高（300美元）
- 主动降噪比 AZ80 稍弱
- 触控需要适应
Sound quality 8
Call quality 3
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 4
Battery life 2
Value for money 3
CCA CRA PRO
78 满分 100 置信度低 9 条评价
CCA CRA+ 以其低廉的价格提供了令人印象深刻的音质，许多用户称赞其清晰度和重低音调音。然而，几位评论者指出了耳挂和耳塞的贴合问题，还有一位报告了持续的咔嗒声。总体而言，对于低音爱好者和普通听众来说，这是一个物有所值的选择，但可能不适合追求中性或技术性声音的人。
优点
- 价格实惠，音质出色
- 水晶般清晰的音频清晰度
- 适合低音爱好者的出色重低音调音
- 使用海绵耳塞佩戴舒适
- 可拆卸线缆，方便更换
缺点
- 耳挂和耳塞的贴合问题
- 有用户报告持续的咔嗒声
- 部分产品的耳套松动
- 低音泄漏可能会打扰一些听众
- 不适合追求中性声音的人
Sound quality 8
Value for money 6
Fit and comfort 5
Bass performance 4
Build quality 3
Cable quality 2
评分
Travel
Budget
Calls
Music
Commute
Gaming
Fitness
规格
| Technics EAH-AZ100-N | CCA CRA PRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | ear-hook |
| Ear Tips | Extra large, Large, Medium, Small | S, M, L |
| Weight | 0.05 kg★ | 0.05 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 10 mm★ | — |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | — | 23 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 107 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC | CCA CRA PRO in Ear Monitors, IEMs for Gaming, Ultra-Thin DLC Diaphragm Dynamic Driver Wired Gaming Earbuds, Deep Bass Clear Sound Ear Buds IEM Headphones, in Ears for Singers (Silver, Without Mic) |
| Surround | Dolby Atmos | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | — |
| ANC Type | adaptive | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Profiles | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | 3.5mm |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15 min. for 90 min. playback | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 28 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Mic Count | 6★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | — |
| App | Android & iOS | Android |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | — |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | — |
优缺点
Technics EAH-AZ100-N
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
CCA CRA PRO
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong comfort (72nd percentile)
- Strong sound (65th percentile)
- Below average mic (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average anc (31st percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
价格
Technics EAH-AZ100-N0.010每美元得分
vs
CCA CRA PRO0.048每美元得分
CCA CRA PRO 性价比高 4.8 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100-N
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 22 of 40 specs.
