Xmenha X57
Xmenha
37 综合评分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 综合评分
买家怎么说
Xmenha X57
52 满分 100 置信度低 7 条评价
这些睡眠耳塞收到了褒贬不一的反馈。许多用户称赞其防水设计、充电盒出色的电池续航以及侧睡时的舒适度，但相当多的用户报告一小时后不适、电池续航短、夜间随机发出哔哔声以及几个月后出现充电问题。音质总体不错，但可靠性问题很常见。
优点
- 防水设计
- 充电盒电池续航出色
- 侧睡舒适
- 音质良好
- 日常使用贴合
缺点
- 一小时后不适
- 耳塞电池续航短
- 夜间随机哔哔声
- 几个月后出现充电问题
- 硬塑料导致耳朵疼痛
Comfort 5
Battery life 4
Charging issues 3
Sound quality 2
Waterproof 1
Noise isolation 1
Technics EAH-AZ100
88 满分 100 置信度中 28 条评价
Technics EAH-AZ100 耳机因其卓越的音质而广受赞誉，用户强调深沉的低音、清晰的高音和沉浸式音频。舒适度、电池续航和降噪功能也经常受到称赞，尽管一些用户指出价格较高且音量有限。提到了蓝牙 LE 断开和初始多设备配对等小问题，但总体情绪非常积极。
优点
- 卓越的音质
- 深沉沉浸式低音
- 有效的降噪功能
- 舒适的佩戴感
- 出色的电池续航
缺点
- 价格较高
- 最大音量有限
- 蓝牙 LE 断开
- 多设备配对问题
- 塑料外壳
Sound quality 12
Bass performance 6
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 6
Battery life 5
Value for money 4
评分
Budget
Travel
Calls
Commute
Music
Gaming
Fitness
规格
| Xmenha X57 | Technics EAH-AZ100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | — | 5 x Eartip Pairs |
| Weight | — | 0.05 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | — | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Dolby Atmos |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | — | Bluetooth |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 3.5 hrs | 8 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15 min. for 90 min. playback |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 72 hrs★ | 28 hrs |
| Case Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 6★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Touch Controls | — | ✓★ |
| App | — | Android & iOS |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX5 | IPX4 |
优缺点
Xmenha X57
- Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong battery (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong anc (73rd percentile)
- Strong mic (67th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average comfort (29th percentile)
- Below average sound (29th percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
价格
Xmenha X570.068每美元得分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ1000.015每美元得分
Xmenha X57 性价比高 4.5 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 39 specs.
