FADCAMELOS Two-PackGolden-FBA
FADCAMELOS
41 综合评分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ80
Technics
86 综合评分
买家怎么说
FADCAMELOS Two-PackGolden-FBA
88 满分 100 置信度中 11 条评价
这款二合一无线耳塞套装在一个充电盒中提供了夹耳式和入耳式两种款式，为工作、锻炼、睡眠和通勤等不同活动提供了灵活性。用户一致称赞其轻巧的设计、长时间佩戴的舒适性、清晰且低音强劲的音质、稳定的蓝牙连接以及令人印象深刻的电池续航。少数小抱怨提到了对小耳朵的贴合问题、过于灵敏的触控以及一例收到空盒的情况，但总体情绪极为积极。
优点
- 轻巧舒适的设计
- 清晰且低音强劲的音质
- 稳定的蓝牙连接
- 令人印象深刻的电池续航
- 多功能的二合一夹耳式和入耳式款式
缺点
- 对小耳朵的贴合问题
- 触控过于敏感
- 较小的耳塞缺乏额外尺寸选项
- 一例收到空盒的情况
Comfort and fit 8
Sound quality 7
Battery life 5
Versatility 6
Build quality 4
Touch controls 2
Technics EAH-AZ80
78 满分 100 置信度中 21 条评价
Technics EAH-AZ10 耳机因其卓越的音质获得了压倒性的积极反馈，具有清晰分离、宽广声场和自然调音，可与高端型号媲美。用户称赞其舒适稳固的贴合度、不会使音频浑浊的有效降噪以及长达7小时的出色电池续航。然而，一些批评性评论指出了触摸控制不灵敏的问题，一位用户在使用1.5年后出现了明显的音量不平衡，而公司仅提供10%的折扣用于更换。总体而言，强烈推荐给发烧友和日常使用，但潜在买家应意识到可能的耐用性和控制问题。
优点
- 卓越的音质，清晰分离
- 舒适稳固的贴合度
- 有效的降噪，不损失音质
- 长达7小时的出色电池续航
- 出色的通话质量
缺点
- 触摸控制不灵敏
- 长时间使用后音量不平衡
- 缺陷产品客户服务差
- 对某些用户来说设计笨重
- 在非常嘈杂的环境中降噪不足
Sound quality 10
Fit and comfort 7
Noise cancellation 7
Battery life 6
Call quality 4
Touch controls 2
评分
Calls
Commute
Music
Gaming
Travel
Budget
Fitness
规格
| FADCAMELOS Two-PackGolden-FBA | Technics EAH-AZ80 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | — | XS, S, M, L, XL |
| Weight | — | 0.01 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 13 mm★ | 10 mm |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | 2-in-1 Wireless Earbuds Set, Open-Ear Clip & Mini Sleep Headphones, 36H Battery, Bass Sound, Ultra Comfortable, IPX5 Waterproof, Stylish for Work/Sport/Sleep | AAC, LDAC, SBC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | hybrid |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 4 hrs | 7 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15 Minutes for 1.1 Hours |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 36 hrs★ | 16 hrs |
| Case Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Capacity | — | 85 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 8★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Alexa, Siri |
| Touch Controls | — | ✓★ |
| App | — | Technics Audio Connect |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX5 | IPX4 |
优缺点
FADCAMELOS Two-PackGolden-FBA
- Strong user sentiment (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong mic (65th percentile)
- Below average battery (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average comfort (28th percentile)
- Below average anc (31st percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ80
- Strong mic (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong sound (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Below average affordability (10th percentile)10th %ile
价格
FADCAMELOS Two-PackGolden-FBA0.052每美元得分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ800.018每美元得分
FADCAMELOS Two-PackGolden-FBA 性价比高 2.9 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ80
Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 18 of 36 specs.
