TipsyAudio M1 Ca-M1
TipsyAudio
43 综合评分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 综合评分
买家怎么说
TipsyAudio M1 Ca-M1
92 满分 100 置信度低 9 条评价
Tipsy M1 入耳式耳机因其均衡的声音风格、舒适的佩戴感和以实惠价格提供的优质做工而获得压倒性的正面反馈。用户强调清晰的中频、细节丰富但不刺耳的高频以及有力的低频，使其适用于音乐、游戏和媒体。唯一的轻微批评是线缆长度稍短，但可单独购买更长的选项。
优点
- 均衡的声音风格
- 长时间佩戴舒适
- 优质做工
- 性价比高
- 清晰的中频和细节丰富的高频
缺点
- 线缆长度较短
Sound quality 9
Comfort 5
Build quality 5
Value for money 7
Noise isolation 4
Design 3
Technics EAH-AZ100
88 满分 100 置信度中 28 条评价
Technics EAH-AZ100 耳机因其卓越的音质而广受赞誉，用户强调深沉的低音、清晰的高音和沉浸式音频。舒适度、电池续航和降噪功能也经常受到称赞，尽管一些用户指出价格较高且音量有限。提到了蓝牙 LE 断开和初始多设备配对等小问题，但总体情绪非常积极。
优点
- 卓越的音质
- 深沉沉浸式低音
- 有效的降噪功能
- 舒适的佩戴感
- 出色的电池续航
缺点
- 价格较高
- 最大音量有限
- 蓝牙 LE 断开
- 多设备配对问题
- 塑料外壳
Sound quality 12
Bass performance 6
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 6
Battery life 5
Value for money 4
评分
Calls
Travel
Music
Commute
Gaming
Budget
Fitness
规格
| TipsyAudio M1 Ca-M1 | Technics EAH-AZ100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | In Ear | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | l | 5 x Eartip Pairs |
| Weight | — | 0.01 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | 1 | 1 |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 24 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 106 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | Bamboo Fiber Diaphragm, Single Dynamic Driver with Dual-Chamber Airflow, Hand-Crafted Resin Faceplate | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Dolby Atmos, Spatial Audio |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | Bluetooth |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 8 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15 min. for 90 min. playback |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 28 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 6★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Touch Controls | — | ✓★ |
| App | — | Android & iOS |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | — | IPX4 |
优缺点
TipsyAudio M1 Ca-M1
- Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (74th percentile)
- Strong mic (65th percentile)
- Below average affordability (24th percentile)
- Below average comfort (28th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (31st percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
价格
TipsyAudio M1 Ca-M10.022每美元得分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ1000.012每美元得分
TipsyAudio M1 Ca-M1 性价比高 1.8 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 18 of 40 specs.
