Lenovo M710S
Lenovo
41 综合评分
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025
HP
96 综合评分
买家怎么说
Lenovo M710S
暂无用户反馈
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025
95 满分 100 置信度中 13 条评价
搭载Ryzen 7 8700F和RTX 5070的HP OMEN 35L台式机获得了压倒性的正面反馈。用户称赞其强大的性能、安静的运行和出色的散热，使其成为游戏和生产力任务的理想选择。构建质量和设计也被强调为坚固和现代。问答中提到了关于附带外设和灯光定制的一些小问题，但总体情绪非常高。
优点
- 强大的性能
- 安静的运行
- 出色的散热
- 坚固的构建质量
- 快速的SSD存储
缺点
- 不包含键盘/鼠标
- 灯光定制不明确
Performance 5
Quiet operation 4
Cooling 3
Build quality 3
Storage speed 3
Upgradability 2
评分
Gaming
Business
Creator
Developer
Home Office
Workstation
Ai Llm
Compact
规格
| Lenovo M710S | HP OMEN GT16-0364 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | Core i3 | AMD Ryzen 7 8700F★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | 无数据 | |
| Cores | 2 | 8★ |
| Frequency | 3.7 GHz | 4.1 GHz★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 16 MB★ |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU | Intel HD Graphics 5500 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070★ |
| GPU Benchmark Score | 无数据 | |
| Type | integrated★ | discrete |
| VRAM | — | 12 GB★ |
| VRAM Type | — | GDDR7 |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 32 GB★ |
| RAM Generation | DDR4 | DDR5★ |
| Storage 1 | 256 GB | 1 TB★ |
| Storage 1 Type | SSD | SSD |
| Build | ||
| Form Factor | sff | mid-tower |
| PSU | — | 850W★ |
| Weight | — | 14.50 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 6★ | 2 |
| USB Ports | 8 | 8 |
| Thunderbolt | — | 0 |
| HDMI | 1x HDMI | 1 x HDMI |
| DisplayPort | 1x DP | 3 x DisplayPort |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6★ |
| Bluetooth | — | Bluetooth 5.3★ |
| Ethernet | — | Gigabit Ethernet |
| System | ||
| OS | Windows 11 Pro | Windows 11 Home |
优缺点
Lenovo M710S
- Strong port selection (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong reliability (69th percentile)
- Below average storage (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average gpu (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average cpu (24th percentile)
- Below average social proof (30th percentile)
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong port selection (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong ram (89th percentile)89th %ile
结论
胜出: HP OMEN GT16-0364
Scores 96 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 14 of 26 specs.