PC Server and Parts E5-2697 v2-cr
PC Server and Parts
40 综合评分
vs
Intel Celeron G6900 2-core LGA1700
Intel
48 综合评分
买家怎么说
PC Server and Parts E5-2697 v2-cr
暂无用户反馈
Intel Celeron G6900 2-core LGA1700
55 满分 100 置信度低 6 条评价
唯一的一条评论将Intel Celeron G6900描述为一款预算处理器，能够很好地处理基本的Windows任务，如文字处理，但指出其在更苛刻用途上的局限性。问答部分澄清了它附带散热风扇，需要LGA 1700插槽，支持DDR4和DDR5内存，并具有适合基本任务的集成显卡。总体情绪略偏正面，重点关注性价比。
优点
- 价格实惠
- 足以处理基本任务
- 附带散热风扇
- 支持DDR4和DDR5
缺点
- 对高要求任务有限
- 仅基本性能
Value for money 1
Performance 1
Cooling solution 1
Memory support 1
Integrated graphics 1
评分
Budget
Efficiency
Gaming
Productivity
Server
Ai Llm
规格
| PC Server and Parts E5-2697 v2-cr | Intel Celeron G6900 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | — | Intel |
| Series | — | Celeron |
| Model | — | G6900 |
| Codename | — | Alder Lake |
| Class | — | desktop |
| Process | — | 7★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 2★ |
| P-cores | — | 2★ |
| Threads | — | 2★ |
| Base Clock | 无数据 | |
| Boost Clock | 无数据 | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 2.5★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 4★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR4★ |
| Max Speed | 无数据 | |
| Channels | — | 2★ |
| Max Memory | 无数据 | |
| ECC | — | ✗ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | — | LGA1700 |
| PCIe | — | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20★ |
| TDP | — | 46★ |
| Max Turbo Power | — | 46★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✗ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | — | Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
优缺点
PC Server and Parts E5-2697 v2-cr
- Strong affordability (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong multi thread (68th percentile)
- Below average platform (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average feature (21st percentile)
- Below average efficiency (29th percentile)
Intel Celeron G6900 2-core LGA1700
- Strong affordability (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong platform (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong single thread (76th percentile)
- Strong feature (70th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average social proof (19th percentile)19th %ile
结论
胜出: Intel Celeron G6900
Scores 48 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 16 of 27 specs.