Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA 1851
Intel
98 综合评分
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 6-core AM4
AMD
65 综合评分
买家怎么说
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA 1851
88 满分 100 置信度高 32 条评价
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 因其原始性能而广受赞誉，尤其是在4K游戏和繁重多任务处理方面，用户注意到与旧CPU相比有显著提升。在适当散热下保持凉爽，其效率和DDR5及PCIe 5.0支持被强调为重大优势。一些人提到在1080p/1440p游戏中可能不如AMD，但在4K和生产力方面表现出色。少数人指出缺少散热器和托盘包装是次要缺点，但整体情绪非常积极。
优点
- 出色的4K游戏性能
- 强大的多任务处理和生产效率
- 适当散热下保持凉爽
- 支持DDR5和PCIe 5.0
- 能效高（125W TDP）
缺点
- 不附带散热器
- 托盘包装（无零售盒）
- 在1080p/1440p游戏中可能落后于AMD
- 需要BIOS调整以获得最佳性能
- 价格较高
Gaming performance 8
Multitasking productivity 6
Thermal management 5
Power efficiency 4
Memory support 4
Value for money 3
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 6-core AM4
62 满分 100 置信度中 12 条评价
Ryzen 5 1600 因其性能和性价比而受到称赞，但一条经过验证的评论抱怨缺少附带的散热器。问答回复确认该 CPU 没有集成显卡，需要独立 GPU，并且兼容 AM4 主板但不兼容 Intel 主板。整体情绪复杂，但由于强劲的性能和良好的原装散热器而偏向积极。
优点
- 性价比高
- 真正的6核12线程CPU
- 原装散热器不错
- 可使用原装散热器超频
- 兼容AM4主板
缺点
- 包装中缺少散热器
- 没有集成显卡
- 不兼容Intel主板
Performance 3
Value for money 2
Stock cooler 4
Integrated graphics 2
Motherboard compatibility 3
Overclocking 2
评分
Ai Llm
Productivity
Gaming
Budget
Efficiency
Server
规格
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | AMD |
| Series | Core Ultra 9 | Ryzen 5 |
| Model | 285K | 1600 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake-S | Zen |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Process | 3★ | 14 |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 24★ | 6 |
| P-cores | 8★ | 6 |
| E-cores | 16★ | — |
| Threads | 24★ | 12 |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 40★ | 3 |
| L3 Cache | 36★ | 16 |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR5★ | DDR4 |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max Memory | 无数据 | |
| ECC | ✓ | ✓ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA 1851 | AM4 |
| PCIe | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | 24★ | 16 |
| TDP | 125 | 65★ |
| Max Turbo Power | 250★ | — |
| Unlocked | ✓ | ✓ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | Intel Graphics | — |
| NPU TOPS | 13★ | — |
优缺点
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA 1851
- Strong feature (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong single thread (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong efficiency (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong multi thread (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Below average affordability (18th percentile)18th %ile
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 6-core AM4
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong efficiency (76th percentile)
- Strong platform (76th percentile)
- Strong feature (75th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (8th percentile)8th %ile
价格
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA 18510.007每美元得分
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 6-core AM40.036每美元得分
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 6-core AM4 性价比高 5.1 倍
结论
胜出: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Scores 98 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 17 of 29 specs.