Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851
Intel
98 综合评分
vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX 24-core sWRX8
AMD
76 综合评分
买家怎么说
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851
88 满分 100 置信度高 32 条评价
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 因其原始性能而广受赞誉，尤其是在4K游戏和繁重多任务处理方面，用户注意到与旧CPU相比有显著提升。在适当散热下保持凉爽，其效率和DDR5及PCIe 5.0支持被强调为重大优势。一些人提到在1080p/1440p游戏中可能不如AMD，但在4K和生产力方面表现出色。少数人指出缺少散热器和托盘包装是次要缺点，但整体情绪非常积极。
优点
- 出色的4K游戏性能
- 强大的多任务处理和生产效率
- 适当散热下保持凉爽
- 支持DDR5和PCIe 5.0
- 能效高（125W TDP）
缺点
- 不附带散热器
- 托盘包装（无零售盒）
- 在1080p/1440p游戏中可能落后于AMD
- 需要BIOS调整以获得最佳性能
- 价格较高
Gaming performance 8
Multitasking productivity 6
Thermal management 5
Power efficiency 4
Memory support 4
Value for money 3
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX 24-core sWRX8
72 满分 100 置信度中 10 条评价
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX 是一款高端工作站处理器，拥有24核48线程，支持DDR4 3200内存和Windows 11。其TDP为280W，需要强大的散热，且没有集成显卡。用户赞赏其在专业工作负载中的性能，但指出它不适合游戏，并且需要特定的sWRX8主板。
优点
- 24核48线程
- 支持DDR4 3200内存
- 兼容Windows 11
- 专业工作负载的高性能
缺点
- 无集成显卡
- 高功耗（280W）
- 需要特定的sWRX8主板
- 不适合游戏
Performance 3
Power consumption 2
Cooling requirement 2
Motherboard compatibility 2
Gaming suitability 2
Integrated graphics 1
评分
Ai Llm
Budget
Productivity
Server
Gaming
Efficiency
规格
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | AMD |
| Series | Core Ultra 9 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO |
| Model | 285K | 5965WX |
| Codename | Arrow Lake-S | Chagall PRO (Zen 3) |
| Class | desktop | hedt |
| Process | 3★ | 7 |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 24 | 24 |
| P-cores | 8 | 24★ |
| E-cores | 16★ | — |
| Threads | 24 | 48★ |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 40★ | 12 |
| L3 Cache | ||
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR5★ | DDR4 |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | 2 | 8★ |
| Max Memory | ||
| ECC | ✓ | ✓ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA 1851 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | ||
| TDP | 125★ | 280 |
| Max Turbo Power | 250★ | 280 |
| Unlocked | ✓ | ✓ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | Intel Graphics | None |
| NPU TOPS | 13★ | — |
优缺点
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851
- Strong feature (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong single thread (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong efficiency (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX 24-core sWRX8
- Strong feature (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong platform (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong ai (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong multi thread (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Below average social proof (21st percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
价格
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA18510.007每美元得分
vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX 24-core sWRX80.002每美元得分
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851 性价比高 3.5 倍
结论
胜出: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Scores 98 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 29 specs.