Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 4-core AM4
be quiet!
40 综合评分
vs
Intel Celeron G6900 2-core LGA1700
Intel
48 综合评分
买家怎么说
Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 4-core AM4
暂无用户反馈
Intel Celeron G6900 2-core LGA1700
55 满分 100 置信度低 6 条评价
唯一的一条评论将Intel Celeron G6900描述为一款预算处理器，能够很好地处理基本的Windows任务，如文字处理，但指出其在更苛刻用途上的局限性。问答部分澄清了它附带散热风扇，需要LGA 1700插槽，支持DDR4和DDR5内存，并具有适合基本任务的集成显卡。总体情绪略偏正面，重点关注性价比。
优点
- 价格实惠
- 足以处理基本任务
- 附带散热风扇
- 支持DDR4和DDR5
缺点
- 对高要求任务有限
- 仅基本性能
Value for money 1
Performance 1
Cooling solution 1
Memory support 1
Integrated graphics 1
评分
Budget
Efficiency
Gaming
Productivity
Server
Ai Llm
规格
| Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 | Intel Celeron G6900 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | Intel |
| Series | Ryzen 3 | Celeron |
| Model | 1200 | G6900 |
| Codename | Zen | Alder Lake |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Process | 14 | 7★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 4★ | 2 |
| P-cores | 4★ | 2 |
| Threads | 4★ | 2 |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 2 | 2.5★ |
| L3 Cache | 8★ | 4 |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | — | 2★ |
| Max Memory | 无数据 | |
| ECC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20★ |
| TDP | 270 | 46★ |
| Max Turbo Power | — | 46★ |
| Unlocked | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | — | Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
优缺点
Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 4-core AM4
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong affordability (76th percentile)
- Below average efficiency (27th percentile)
Intel Celeron G6900 2-core LGA1700
- Strong affordability (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong platform (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong single thread (76th percentile)
- Strong feature (70th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average social proof (19th percentile)19th %ile
结论
胜出: Intel Celeron G6900
Scores 48 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 27 specs.