AMD Ryzen 5 5000 Series 5600 6-core AM4
AMD
72 综合评分
vs
Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 32-core Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462)
Dell
81 综合评分
买家怎么说
AMD Ryzen 5 5000 Series 5600 6-core AM4
72 满分 100 置信度中 14 条评价
大多数买家对Ryzen 5 5600的性能和性价比感到满意，尤其是在游戏和4K视频编辑方面。然而，多条评论警告说，CPU可能在没有宣传的散热器的情况下送达，还有一个单元的针脚弯曲。运输可能较慢，但出现问题时客户服务响应迅速。
优点
- 性价比高
- 游戏性能强劲
- 适合4K视频编辑
- 快速且响应灵敏
- 客户服务响应迅速
缺点
- 缺少宣传的散热器
- 到货时针脚弯曲
- 运输缓慢
- 产品描述具有误导性
Value for money 5
Gaming performance 3
Missing cooler 3
Shipping speed 3
Product description accuracy 2
Build quality 1
Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 32-core Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462)
暂无用户反馈
评分
Productivity
Server
Budget
Efficiency
Ai Llm
Gaming
规格
| AMD Ryzen 5 5000 Series 5600 | Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | Intel |
| Series | Ryzen 5 | Xeon |
| Model | 5600 | 5-2637 V2 |
| Codename | Vermeer | Turin |
| Class | desktop | server |
| Process | 7 | 4★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 6 | 32★ |
| P-cores | 6 | 48★ |
| Threads | 12 | 64★ |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 3 | 48★ |
| L3 Cache | ||
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | 2★ | — |
| Max Memory | ||
| ECC | ✓ | ✓ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | AM4 | Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462) |
| PCIe | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 64★ |
| TDP | 65★ | 200 |
| Max Turbo Power | — | 350★ |
| Unlocked | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | None | No |
优缺点
AMD Ryzen 5 5000 Series 5600 6-core AM4
- Strong feature (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong efficiency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong single thread (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong platform (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average user sentiment (21st percentile)
Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 32-core Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462)
- Strong ai (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong multi thread (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong efficiency (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong feature (91st percentile)91st %ile
结论
胜出: Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2
Scores 81 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 27 specs.