AMD Ryzen 5 8400F 6-core AM5
AMD
82 综合评分
vs
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851
Intel
98 综合评分
买家怎么说
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F 6-core AM5
72 满分 100 置信度中 18 条评价
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F 因其性能和性价比而普遍受到好评，许多用户称赞其性价比和易于安装。然而，也有明显的投诉，包括配送延迟、卖家欺诈体验以及 OEM 版本不附带散热器。有人建议如果价格超过 100 美元，考虑购买 Ryzen 7600。
优点
- 出色的性价比
- 易于安装
- 整体性能良好
- 附带 Wraith Stealth 散热器（零售版）
- 低 TDP（65W）
缺点
- 配送缓慢
- 卖家欺诈体验
- OEM 版本无散热器
- 价格可能过高
- 可能存在主板问题
Value for money 5
Performance 4
Shipping delays 1
Seller reliability 1
Cooler included 3
Ease of setup 2
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851
88 满分 100 置信度高 32 条评价
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 因其原始性能而广受赞誉，尤其是在4K游戏和繁重多任务处理方面，用户注意到与旧CPU相比有显著提升。在适当散热下保持凉爽，其效率和DDR5及PCIe 5.0支持被强调为重大优势。一些人提到在1080p/1440p游戏中可能不如AMD，但在4K和生产力方面表现出色。少数人指出缺少散热器和托盘包装是次要缺点，但整体情绪非常积极。
优点
- 出色的4K游戏性能
- 强大的多任务处理和生产效率
- 适当散热下保持凉爽
- 支持DDR5和PCIe 5.0
- 能效高（125W TDP）
缺点
- 不附带散热器
- 托盘包装（无零售盒）
- 在1080p/1440p游戏中可能落后于AMD
- 需要BIOS调整以获得最佳性能
- 价格较高
Gaming performance 8
Multitasking productivity 6
Thermal management 5
Power efficiency 4
Memory support 4
Value for money 3
评分
Ai Llm
Budget
Productivity
Efficiency
Gaming
Server
规格
| AMD Ryzen 5 8400F | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | Intel |
| Series | Ryzen 5 | Core Ultra 9 |
| Model | 8400F | 285K |
| Codename | Phoenix | Arrow Lake-S |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Process | 4 | 3★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 6 | 24★ |
| P-cores | 6 | 8★ |
| E-cores | — | 16★ |
| Threads | 12 | 24★ |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 6 | 40★ |
| L3 Cache | 16 | 36★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max Memory | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | AM5 | LGA 1851 |
| PCIe | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24★ |
| TDP | 65★ | 125 |
| Max Turbo Power | 65★ | 250 |
| Unlocked | ✓ | ✓ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon graphics | Intel Graphics |
| NPU TOPS | — | 13★ |
优缺点
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F 6-core AM5
- Strong efficiency (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong single thread (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong platform (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851
- Strong feature (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong single thread (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong efficiency (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
价格
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F 6-core AM50.027每美元得分
vs
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA18510.007每美元得分
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F 6-core AM5 性价比高 3.9 倍
结论
胜出: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Scores 98 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 15 of 29 specs.