MICRO CENTER 225FB860MEAGLEPL
MICRO CENTER
56 综合评分
vs
Intel Core i3 10320 4-core LGA 1200
Intel
59 综合评分
买家怎么说
MICRO CENTER 225FB860MEAGLEPL
暂无用户反馈
Intel Core i3 10320 4-core LGA 1200
78 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
Intel Core i3-10320 在预算装机、办公和轻量服务器中普遍受到好评。用户称赞其速度和性价比，但部分人指出涡轮加速无法达到宣传的4.6 GHz，仅能到4.4-4.5 GHz。有评论提到原装散热器下温度较高，还有一位买家收到了二手产品而非新品。
优点
- 价格实惠，速度不错
- 适合预算游戏和办公
- 低功耗（65W TDP）
- 原装散热器安装简便
- 相比旧款i3提升明显
缺点
- 涡轮加速低于宣传的4.6 GHz（仅4.4-4.5 GHz）
- 原装散热器下温度较高
- 部分产品收到的是二手而非全新
Performance 6
Value for money 4
Turbo boost accuracy 3
Cooling 2
Product condition 1
Power consumption 2
评分
Budget
Efficiency
Productivity
Gaming
Ai Llm
Server
规格
| MICRO CENTER 225FB860MEAGLEPL | Intel Core i3 10320 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | — | Intel |
| Series | — | Core i3 |
| Model | — | 10320 |
| Codename | — | Comet Lake |
| Class | — | desktop |
| Process | — | 14★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 4★ |
| Threads | — | 8★ |
| Base Clock | 无数据 | |
| Boost Clock | 无数据 | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 1★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 8★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR4★ |
| Max Speed | 无数据 | |
| Channels | — | 2★ |
| Max Memory | 无数据 | |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | — | LGA 1200 |
| PCIe | — | 3.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16★ |
| TDP | — | 65★ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | — | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
优缺点
MICRO CENTER 225FB860MEAGLEPL
- Strong single thread (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong multi thread (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong ai (68th percentile)
- Below average platform (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average feature (21st percentile)
- Below average affordability (27th percentile)
Intel Core i3 10320 4-core LGA 1200
- Strong single thread (79th percentile)
- Strong social proof (73rd percentile)
- Strong efficiency (70th percentile)
- Strong platform (69th percentile)
价格
MICRO CENTER 225FB860MEAGLEPL0.007每美元得分
vs
Intel Core i3 10320 4-core LGA 12000.016每美元得分
Intel Core i3 10320 4-core LGA 1200 性价比高 2.3 倍
结论
胜出: Intel Core i3 10320
Scores 59 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 13 of 23 specs.
