MICRO CENTER 225FB860MEAGLEPL
MICRO CENTER
56 综合评分
vs
AMD A-Series A6-9500 2-core AM4
AMD
38 综合评分
买家怎么说
MICRO CENTER 225FB860MEAGLEPL
暂无用户反馈
AMD A-Series A6-9500 2-core AM4
72 满分 100 置信度低 5 条评价
该处理器在性能和性价比方面普遍获得积极反馈，用户指出它适用于游戏和日常任务。然而，与某些主板的兼容性问题以及BIOS更新的必要性是常见的注意事项。附带的散热器受到赞赏，尽管一些用户不确定是否预涂了导热膏。
优点
- 游戏性能良好
- 性价比高
- 附带散热器和导热膏
缺点
- 与某些主板存在兼容性问题
- 可能需要更新BIOS
- 对预涂导热膏的不确定性
Performance 2
Value for money 1
Compatibility 3
Bios update 2
Cooler 2
Thermal paste 2
评分
Productivity
Budget
Gaming
Efficiency
Ai Llm
Server
规格
| MICRO CENTER 225FB860MEAGLEPL | AMD A-Series A6-9500 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | — | AMD |
| Series | — | A6 7th Gen |
| Model | — | A6-9500 |
| Codename | — | Bristol Rider |
| Class | — | desktop |
| Process | — | 28★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 2★ |
| Threads | — | 2★ |
| Base Clock | 无数据 | |
| Boost Clock | 无数据 | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 1★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 1★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | 无数据 | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR4★ |
| Max Speed | 无数据 | |
| Channels | — | 2★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | — | AM4 |
| PCIe | — | 3.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 8★ |
| TDP | — | 65★ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | — | AMD Radeon R5 |
优缺点
MICRO CENTER 225FB860MEAGLEPL
- Strong single thread (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong multi thread (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong ai (68th percentile)
- Below average platform (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average feature (21st percentile)
- Below average affordability (27th percentile)
AMD A-Series A6-9500 2-core AM4
- Strong social proof (74th percentile)
- Strong feature (70th percentile)
- Strong platform (65th percentile)
- Below average ai (21st percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (21st percentile)
- Below average multi thread (24th percentile)
- Below average efficiency (30th percentile)
价格
MICRO CENTER 225FB860MEAGLEPL0.007每美元得分
vs
AMD A-Series A6-9500 2-core AM40.009每美元得分
AMD A-Series A6-9500 2-core AM4 性价比高 1.3 倍
结论
胜出: MICRO CENTER 225FB860MEAGLEPL
Scores 56 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 2 of 22 specs.
