MICRO CENTER 225FB860MEAGLEPL
MICRO CENTER
56 综合评分
vs
Intel Core i5 8400 6-core LGA 1151
Intel
62 综合评分
买家怎么说
MICRO CENTER 225FB860MEAGLEPL
暂无用户反馈
Intel Core i5 8400 6-core LGA 1151
88 满分 100 置信度低 6 条评价
用户对这款CPU非常满意，称赞其性能、低温运行和性价比。它能很好地处理游戏和日常任务，一位用户提到了一流的基准测试分数。小缺点包括时钟速度规格的差异和GPU价格过高，但总体情绪非常积极。
优点
- 性能出色
- 运行低温
- 性价比高
- 游戏处理良好
- 稳定可靠
缺点
- 时钟速度规格差异
- GPU价格过高（外部）
Performance 5
Value for money 4
Cool operation 3
Gaming capability 3
Stability 2
Clock speed spec 1
评分
Budget
Productivity
Efficiency
Gaming
Ai Llm
Server
规格
| MICRO CENTER 225FB860MEAGLEPL | Intel Core i5 8400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | — | Intel |
| Series | — | Core i5 |
| Model | — | 8400 |
| Codename | — | Coffee Lake |
| Class | — | desktop |
| Process | — | 14★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 6★ |
| Threads | — | 6★ |
| Base Clock | 无数据 | |
| Boost Clock | 无数据 | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 1.5★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 9★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR4★ |
| Max Speed | 无数据 | |
| Channels | — | 2★ |
| Max Memory | — | 64★ |
| ECC | — | ✗ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | — | LGA 1151 |
| PCIe | — | 3.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16★ |
| TDP | — | 65★ |
| Max Turbo Power | — | 65★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✗ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | — | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
优缺点
MICRO CENTER 225FB860MEAGLEPL
- Strong single thread (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong multi thread (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong ai (68th percentile)
- Below average platform (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average feature (21st percentile)
- Below average affordability (27th percentile)
Intel Core i5 8400 6-core LGA 1151
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (79th percentile)
- Strong affordability (72nd percentile)
- Strong platform (69th percentile)
价格
MICRO CENTER 225FB860MEAGLEPL0.007每美元得分
vs
Intel Core i5 8400 6-core LGA 11510.023每美元得分
Intel Core i5 8400 6-core LGA 1151 性价比高 3.3 倍
结论
胜出: Intel Core i5 8400
Scores 62 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 14 of 26 specs.
