AMD A Series A12-9800E 4-core AM4
AMD
42 综合评分
vs
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA 1851
Intel
99 综合评分
买家怎么说
AMD A Series A12-9800E 4-core AM4
90 满分 100 置信度低 9 条评价
AMD AD9800AHAABBOX CPU（带散热器）一直被用户称赞为预算和中端PC的可靠、稳定之选。用户强调其性价比极高，特别是对于没有独立显卡的系统，同时指出其运行安静且能效出色。部分用户提到它不是最快的，但很可靠，适合日常任务和家庭电脑使用。
优点
- 预算构建的超高性价比
- 开箱即用，运行可靠
- 非常适合没有独立显卡的系统
- 日常任务表现出色
- 运行安静
缺点
- 不是最快的CPU
- 通过直连插槽（NGFF）的M.2 SSD功能有限
- 部分用户认为它属于中端性能
Value for money 5
Performance 5
Reliability 4
Power efficiency 3
Quiet operation 2
Included cooler 2
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA 1851
88 满分 100 置信度高 32 条评价
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 因其原始性能而广受赞誉，尤其是在4K游戏和繁重多任务处理方面，用户注意到与旧CPU相比有显著提升。在适当散热下保持凉爽，其效率和DDR5及PCIe 5.0支持被强调为重大优势。一些人提到在1080p/1440p游戏中可能不如AMD，但在4K和生产力方面表现出色。少数人指出缺少散热器和托盘包装是次要缺点，但整体情绪非常积极。
优点
- 出色的4K游戏性能
- 强大的多任务处理和生产效率
- 适当散热下保持凉爽
- 支持DDR5和PCIe 5.0
- 能效高（125W TDP）
缺点
- 不附带散热器
- 托盘包装（无零售盒）
- 在1080p/1440p游戏中可能落后于AMD
- 需要BIOS调整以获得最佳性能
- 价格较高
Gaming performance 8
Multitasking productivity 6
Thermal management 5
Power efficiency 4
Memory support 4
Value for money 3
评分
Ai Llm
Productivity
Gaming
Budget
Efficiency
Server
规格
| AMD A Series A12-9800E | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | Intel |
| Series | A12 | Core Ultra 9 |
| Model | A12-9800E | 285K |
| Codename | Bristol Ridge | Arrow Lake-S |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Process | — | 3★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 4 | 24★ |
| P-cores | — | 8★ |
| E-cores | — | 16★ |
| Threads | — | 24★ |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 4 | 40★ |
| L3 Cache | 2 | 36★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR5★ |
| Max Speed | 无数据 | |
| Channels | — | 2★ |
| Max Memory | 无数据 | |
| ECC | — | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | AM4 | LGA 1851 |
| PCIe | — | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24★ |
| TDP | 35★ | 125 |
| Max Turbo Power | — | 250★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✓★ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon R7 Graphics | Intel Graphics |
| NPU TOPS | — | 13★ |
优缺点
AMD A Series A12-9800E 4-core AM4
- Strong user sentiment (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong feature (70th percentile)
- Below average platform (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average ai (30th percentile)
- Below average multi thread (32nd percentile)
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA 1851
- Strong feature (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong single thread (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong efficiency (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong multi thread (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Below average affordability (18th percentile)18th %ile
价格
AMD A Series A12-9800E 4-core AM40.011每美元得分
vs
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA 18510.007每美元得分
AMD A Series A12-9800E 4-core AM4 性价比高 1.6 倍
结论
胜出: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Scores 99 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 20 of 29 specs.