Intel Core i9 9960X 16-core LGA 2066

Intel Core i9 9960X 16-core LGA 2066

Intel
69 Genel Puan
vs
AMD A-Series APU A10-6700 4-core Socket FM2

AMD A-Series APU A10-6700 4-core Socket FM2

AMD
36 Genel Puan

Puanlar

Productivity
Intel
73
AMD
36
Ai Llm
Intel
68
AMD
34
Budget
Intel
62
AMD
55
Gaming
Intel
61
AMD
31
Efficiency
Intel
61
AMD
37
Server
Intel
60
AMD
30

Teknik Özellikler

Intel Core i9 9960XAMD A-Series APU A10-6700
Processor
BrandIntelAMD
SeriesCore i9A-Series APU
Model9960XA10-6700
CodenameSkylake XRichland
Classdesktopdesktop
Process14★32
Cores & Clocks
Cores16★4
P-cores—4★
Threads32★4
Base Clock
3,100
3,700
Boost Clock
4,400
4,300
Cache
L2 Cache16★4
L3 Cache22★8
Performance
PassMark Multi
29,550
3,111
PassMark Single
2,587
1,601
Memory
Memory TypeDDR4DDR3, DDR4
Max Speed
2,666
2,133
Channels4★2
Max Memory—64★
ECC✗✗
Platform & Power
SocketLGA 2066Socket FM2
PCIe3.03.0
PCIe Lanes44★16
TDP16565★
Unlocked✓★✗
Graphics & AI
Integrated Graphics—AMD Radeon HD 8670D

Artılar ve Eksiler

Intel Core i9 9960X 16-core LGA 2066

  • Strong ai (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong multi thread (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong platform (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong efficiency (75th percentile)
  • Below average affordability (18th percentile)18th %ile

AMD A-Series APU A10-6700 4-core Socket FM2

  • Strong affordability (78th percentile)
  • Strong platform (66th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average multi thread (31st percentile)

Fiyatlar

AMD A-Series APU A10-6700 4-core Socket FM2 is MX$19.569 cheaper (7.8x less).

Intel Core i9 9960X 16-core LGA 20660.003dolar başına puan
vs
AMD A-Series APU A10-6700 4-core Socket FM20.013dolar başına puan

AMD A-Series APU A10-6700 4-core Socket FM2 4.3x daha iyi fiyat-performans sunuyor

Intel Core i9 9960X 16-core LGA 2066

AMD A-Series APU A10-6700 4-core Socket FM2

Sonuç

★ Kazanan: Intel Core i9 9960X

Scores 69 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 26 specs.

Intel Core i9 9960X Daha iyi:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity