Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm
Tamron
68 Общая оценка
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Общая оценка
Оценки
Travel
Macro
Budget
Landscape
Street
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Portrait
Video Cinema
Характеристики
| Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm | Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | — |
| Focal Length Min | 18 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 300 mm |
| Elements | 17 | — |
| Groups | 13 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | — |
| ED Elements | 2★ | — |
| Coating | Internal Surface coatings, multiple-layered coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/18 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-6.3 | — |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon F | — |
| Format | APS-C★ | — |
| Weight | 0.40 kg★ | — |
| Filter Thread | 62 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Auto Focus | — |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 450 mm★ | — |
| Max Magnification | 1:3.7★ | — |
Плюсы и минусы
Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm
- Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average bokeh (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
- Below average aperture (34th percentile)
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Вердикт
Победитель: Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm
Scores 68 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 20 specs.