Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II
Sony
74 Общая оценка
vs
Panasonic LUMIX G H-H025K 25-50mm
Panasonic
46 Общая оценка
Оценки
Travel
Landscape
Street
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Video Cinema
Macro
Portrait
Характеристики
| Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II | Panasonic LUMIX G H-H025K 25-50mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 25 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 50 mm | 25 mm |
| Elements | 9 | 8 |
| Groups | 8 | 7 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | 2 |
| ED Elements | 1★ | — |
| Coating | — | Nano Surface Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/5.6 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-5.6 | f/1.7 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Micro Four Thirds |
| Format | APS-C★ | micro-four-thirds |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.11 kg★ | 0.13 kg |
| Filter Thread | 41 mm | 46 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | Automatic/manual |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm | 249 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.215x★ | 0.14x |
Плюсы и минусы
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong optical (69th percentile)
- Below average social proof (21st percentile)
Panasonic LUMIX G H-H025K 25-50mm
- Strong build (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average bokeh (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average aperture (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Цены
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II0.023баллов за доллар
vs
Panasonic LUMIX G H-H025K 25-50mm0.007баллов за доллар
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II предлагает в 3.3x лучшее соотношение цена-качество
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II
Panasonic LUMIX G H-H025K 25-50mm
Вердикт
Победитель: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II
Scores 74 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.
