Sigma Sports 185956 500mm

Sigma Sports 185956 500mm

Sigma
52 Общая оценка
vs
Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon
80 Общая оценка

Оценки

Landscape
Sigma
37
Canon
89
Professional
Sigma
46
Canon
80
Budget
Sigma
50
Canon
80
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
42
Canon
79
Video Cinema
Sigma
52
Canon
75
Travel
Sigma
29
Canon
73
Portrait
Sigma
67
Canon
54
Macro
Sigma
46
Canon
65
Street
Sigma
52
Canon
64

Характеристики

Sigma Sports 185956 500mmCanon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min500 mm15 mm
Focal Length Max500 mm35 mm
Elements1616
Groups1112
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements2
CoatingAir-Sphere coating, Fluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/22
Min Aperturef/32f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSigma SACanon RF
FormatFull-Framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight3.17 kg0.84 kg
Filter Thread46 mm82 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusNano USM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance3.50 m280 mm
Max Magnification1:6.670.21x

Плюсы и минусы

Sigma Sports 185956 500mm

  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Strong aperture (67th percentile)
  • Strong optical (66th percentile)
  • Below average build (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average macro (32nd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

  • Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Вердикт

Победитель: Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Scores 80 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Sigma Sports 185956 500mm Лучше в:

Portrait

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM Лучше в:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports