Fusion5 10.1" FWIN232 PRO N5 Black 2025
Fusion5
43 Pontuação geral
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 11" Redmi Pad 2 Lavender Purple 2025
Xiaomi
66 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Entertainment
Reading
Student
Business
Art Design
Productivity
Especificações
| Fusion5 10.1" FWIN232 PRO N5 | Xiaomi Redmi Pad 11" Redmi Pad 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | 3.4 GHz | 2200 MHz mediatek_helio |
| Cores | 4 | 8★ |
| GPU | UHD Graphics★ | — |
| GPU Benchmark Score | Sem dados | |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 12 GB★ | 8 GB |
| Storage | 512 GB★ | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | SSD★ | eMMC |
| Expandable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Display | ||
| Size | 10.1" | 11" |
| Resolution | 1920 px | 2560 px★ |
| Panel | IPS★ | LCD |
| Refresh Rate | — | 90 Hz★ |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | 802.11ac | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3★ |
| USB-C | 1 | 1 |
| Cellular | ✗ | ✗ |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 0.64 kg★ | 0.89 kg |
| OS | Windows 11 Professional | Android 15 |
Prós e Contras
Fusion5 10.1" FWIN232 PRO N5 Black 2025
- Strong storage (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong ram (81th percentile)81th %ile
- Strong social proof (72th percentile)
- Strong cpu (70th percentile)
- Below average gpu (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (21th percentile)
- Below average battery (31th percentile)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 11" Redmi Pad 2 Lavender Purple 2025
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong cpu (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong gpu (91th percentile)91th %ile
- Strong battery (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Below average feature (28th percentile)
Preços
Fusion5 10.1" FWIN232 PRO N5 Black 20250.003pontos por dólar
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 11" Redmi Pad 2 Lavender Purple 20250.017pontos por dólar
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 11" Redmi Pad 2 Lavender Purple 2025 oferece 5.7x melhor custo-benefício
Fusion5 10.1" FWIN232 PRO N5 Black 2025
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 11" Redmi Pad 2 Lavender Purple 2025
Veredito
Vencedor: Xiaomi Redmi Pad 11" Redmi Pad 2
Scores 66 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 4 of 19 specs.
