MSI Pro MP225
MSI
46 Pontuação geral
vs
Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" Interstellar Indigo
Alienware
81 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Gaming
Office
Entertainment
Creative
Professional
Portable
Especificações
| MSI Pro MP225 | Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 21.5" | 32" |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | IPS★ | VA |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✓ |
| Curvature | — | 1,500 |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 100 Hz | 180 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | Adaptive-Sync | FreeSync★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 250 nits | 400 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 107.4% sRGB, 84% DCI-P3 | DCI-P3 95% |
| Color Depth | 16.7 Million Colors | — |
| HDR | Yes | DisplayHDR 400 |
| HDR Support | — | HDR400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 1 | 2★ |
| DisplayPort | 0 | 1★ |
| USB-C | 0 | 0 |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✗ | — |
| Pivot | ✗ | — |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | — |
| Power | 15W★ | 33W |
| Weight | 2.25 kg★ | 9.19 kg |
Prós e Contras
MSI Pro MP225
- Strong portability (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong feature (72nd percentile)
- Strong performance (69th percentile)
- Below average display (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average connectivity (29th percentile)
Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" Interstellar Indigo
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong feature (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong color (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average portability (15th percentile)15th %ile
Preços
MSI Pro MP2250.016pontos por dólar
vs
Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" Interstellar Indigo0.010pontos por dólar
MSI Pro MP225 oferece 1.6x melhor custo-benefício
MSI Pro MP225
Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" Interstellar Indigo
Veredito
Vencedor: Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32"
Scores 81 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 6 of 29 specs.
